Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40036781›Full record

ReviewEuropean heart journal2025

Cardio-oncology rehabilitation and exercise: evidence, priorities, and research standards from the ICOS-CORE working group.

Scott C Adams, Fernando Rivera-Theurel, Jessica M Scott, Michelle B Nadler, Stephen Foulkes, Darryl Leong, Tormod Nilsen, Charles Porter, Mark Haykowsky, Husam Abdel-Qadir and 5 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European heart journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Oncology Rehabilitation in Australia: A National Survey Update.Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Integrated Cardio-oncology Service.Cardiac failure review · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Scott C AdamsCancer Fatigue Services Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada.
Fernando Rivera-TheurelTed Rogers Cardiotoxicity Prevention Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jessica M ScottDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Michelle B NadlerDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Stephen FoulkesFaculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7651-3740
Darryl LeongThe Population Health Research Institute and Department of Medicine, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Tormod NilsenDepartment of Physical Performance, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Charles PorterDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Mark HaykowskyFaculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Husam Abdel-QadirTed Rogers Cardiotoxicity Prevention Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sarah C HullSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Neil M IyengarBreast Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Christina M Dieli-ConwrightDivision of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Susan F DentWilmot Cancer Institute, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Erin J HowdenCardiometabolic Health and Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, 75 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6657-4395

Funding

The Patient-Reported Outcomes, Community-Engagement and Language (PRO-CEL) CoreP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · 1985 to 2025
$88.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this whitepaper is to review the current state of the literature on the effects of cardio-oncology rehabilitation and exercise (CORE) programmes and provide a roadmap for improving the evidence-based to support the implementation of CORE. There is an urgent need to reinforce and extend the evidence informing the cardiovascular care of cancer survivors. CORE is an attractive model that is potentially scalable to improve the cardiovascular health of cancer survivors as it leverages many of the existing frameworks developed through decades of delivery of cardiac rehabilitation. However, there are several challenges within this burgeoning field, including limited evidence of the efficacy of this approach in patients with cancer. In this paper, a multidisciplinary team of international experts highlights priorities for future research in this field and recommends standards for the conduct of research.

Indexed as

Cardiac RehabilitationCardiovascular DiseasesExercise TherapyNeoplasmsBiomedical ResearchCancer SurvivorsCardio-OncologyHumansMedical Oncology

Identifiers

PMID40036781
PMCPMC12314747

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.