Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40037534›Full record

ReviewOpen biology2025

Schwann cells in regeneration and cancer: an epithelial-mesenchymal transition perspective.

Francisco Gracia, Berta Sanchez-Laorden, Jose A Gomez-Sanchez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Francisco GraciaInstituto de Neurociencias CSIC-UMH, San Juan de Alicante, 03550, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3710-2751
Berta Sanchez-LaordenInstituto de Neurociencias CSIC-UMH, San Juan de Alicante, 03550, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6499-6332
Jose A Gomez-SanchezInstituto de Neurociencias CSIC-UMH, San Juan de Alicante, 03550, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6746-1800

Funding

GVA 'Prometeo Programme' for Groups of ExcellenceISABIALMiguel Servet Fellowship from the Spanish Health Institute Carlos IIIMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Agencia Estatal de Investigación,
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the peripheral nervous system, glial cells, known as Schwann cells (SCs), are responsible for supporting and maintaining nerves. One of the most important characteristics of SCs is their remarkable plasticity. In various injury contexts, SCs undergo a reprogramming process that generates specialized cells to promote tissue regeneration and repair. However, in pathological conditions, this same plasticity and regenerative potential can be hijacked. Different studies highlight the activation of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) as a driver of SC phenotypic plasticity. Although SCs are not epithelial, their neural crest origin makes EMT activation crucial for their ability to adopt repair phenotypes, mirroring the plasticity observed during development. These adaptive processes are essential for regeneration. However, EMT activation in SCs-derived tumours enhances cancer progression and aggressiveness. Furthermore, in the tumour microenvironment (TME), SCs also acquire activated phenotypes that contribute to tumour migration and invasion by activating EMT in cancer cells. In this review, we will discuss how EMT impacts SC plasticity and function from development and tissue regeneration to pathological conditions, such as cancer.

Indexed as

Epithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionNeoplasmsRegenerationSchwann CellsAnimalsCell PlasticityHumansTumor Microenvironmentcancerepithelial–mesenchymal transitionplasticityregenerationSchwann cells

Identifiers

PMID40037534
PMCPMC12105798

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.