ReviewJournal of experimental botany2026
Technological advances in imaging and modelling of leaf structural traits: a review of heat stress in wheat.
Review in Journal of experimental botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cell-based crop phenotyping for future climates.The New phytologist · 2026Review
- High-throughput screening of heat stress response in Chinese cabbage (Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Hyperspectral phenotyping and GWAS identify novel QTLs for soybean photosynthetic rate.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- Tomato Leaf Color Diversity as a Functional Trait: Molecular Mechanisms, Physiological Significance, and Environmental Responses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Rewiring diversity, physiology, and practice: integrating the next decade of wheat science.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Article
- Decoding plant physiology through systems biology: Integrative multi-omics and computational perspectives for next-generation crop design.Plant communications · 2026Review
- Optical coherence tomography for early detection of crop infection.Plant methods · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Abiotic stresses such as heat waves significantly reduce wheat productivity by altering leaf anatomy and physiology, leading to reduced photosynthetic carbon assimilation and crop yield. Despite the advancement in various imaging technologies at the field, canopy, plant, tissue, cellular, and subcellular levels, phenotyping of imaging-based leaf structural traits (e.g. vein density, stomatal density, and stomatal aperture) for abiotic stresses is still time-consuming and expensive without the aid of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML). This review consolidates current knowledge of wheat leaf structural and functional adaptations to heat stress and highlights key advancements in imaging technologies for studying these important phenotypic traits. Recent high-resolution, non-destructive imaging technologies, including confocal laser scanning microscopy, X-ray computed tomography, and optical coherence tomography, have enabled in vivo visualization of plants. Integrating these imaging techniques with AI/ML facilitates high-throughput phenotyping and the modelling of stress responses. We emphasize the potential for future research to leverage these technological advancements in imaging and AI, combining imaging data with physiological and multi-omics studies to deepen the understanding of plant heat tolerance mechanisms. Such multidisciplinary integration in leaf structure phenotyping will accelerate the development of resilient wheat varieties, offering critical insights for crop improvement in the face of climate change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.