Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40037604›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental botany2026

Technological advances in imaging and modelling of leaf structural traits: a review of heat stress in wheat.

Jing He, Kun Ning, Afroz Naznin, Yuanyuan Wang, Chen Chen, Yuanyuan Zuo, Meixue Zhou, Chengdao Li, Rajeev Varshney, Zhong-Hua Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Hyperspectral phenotyping and GWAS identify novel QTLs for soybean photosynthetic rate.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jing HeSchool of Science, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5973-2335
Kun NingSchool of Science, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.
Afroz NazninSchool of Science, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.
Yuanyuan WangSchool of Science, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.
Chen ChenSchool of Science, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.
Yuanyuan ZuoSchool of Science, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.
Meixue ZhouTasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS 7250, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3009-7854
Chengdao LiWestern Crop Genetics Alliance, Centre for Crop and Food Innovation, WA State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Food Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9653-2700
Rajeev VarshneyWestern Crop Genetics Alliance, Centre for Crop and Food Innovation, WA State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Food Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4562-9131
Zhong-Hua ChenSchool of Science, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7531-320X

Funding

Australian Research Council FT210100366Grains Research & Development Corporation WSU2303-001RTX
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abiotic stresses such as heat waves significantly reduce wheat productivity by altering leaf anatomy and physiology, leading to reduced photosynthetic carbon assimilation and crop yield. Despite the advancement in various imaging technologies at the field, canopy, plant, tissue, cellular, and subcellular levels, phenotyping of imaging-based leaf structural traits (e.g. vein density, stomatal density, and stomatal aperture) for abiotic stresses is still time-consuming and expensive without the aid of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML). This review consolidates current knowledge of wheat leaf structural and functional adaptations to heat stress and highlights key advancements in imaging technologies for studying these important phenotypic traits. Recent high-resolution, non-destructive imaging technologies, including confocal laser scanning microscopy, X-ray computed tomography, and optical coherence tomography, have enabled in vivo visualization of plants. Integrating these imaging techniques with AI/ML facilitates high-throughput phenotyping and the modelling of stress responses. We emphasize the potential for future research to leverage these technological advancements in imaging and AI, combining imaging data with physiological and multi-omics studies to deepen the understanding of plant heat tolerance mechanisms. Such multidisciplinary integration in leaf structure phenotyping will accelerate the development of resilient wheat varieties, offering critical insights for crop improvement in the face of climate change.

Indexed as

Heat-Shock ResponsePlant LeavesTriticumArtificial intelligenceimage processingleaf anatomymachine learningmicroscopyphenotypingTriticum aestivum L

Identifiers

PMID40037604
PMCPMC13139670

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.