Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40037836›Full record

Trial reportNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2025

Evaluation of Dual Use: Real Time Reductions in Combustible Cigarette Smoking During Co-Occurring Use of E-Cigarettes.

Matthew J Carpenter, Tracy T Smith, Kyle J Walters, Amy E Wahlquist, Katelyn R Koval, Elias M Klemperer

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthew J CarpenterDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8909-1302
Tracy T SmithDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3109-9106
Kyle J WaltersDepartment of Individual, Family, and Community Education, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Amy E WahlquistCenter for Rural Health Research, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA.
Katelyn R KovalDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, SC, USA.
Elias M KlempererDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7985-0870

Funding

A Naturalistic Nationwide Randomized Study of e-Cigarette Uptake and ConsequencesR01CA210625 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI CARPENTER, MATTHEW J · 2017 to 2021
$2.6M
Dual use of combustible and electronic cigarettes: A fine-grained naturalistic cohort study to investigate dynamic use patterns and trajectories that lead to smoking cessationR01DA061566 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Matthew J Carpenter, Elias M Klemperer · 2024 to 2026
$2.0M
Impact of e-cigarette characteristics on reinforcement and tobacco use patterns among current smokersK01DA047433 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI SMITH, TRACY TAYLOR · 2019 to 2023
$988k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA210625NCI NIH HHS R01 DA061566NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA047433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe pattern and trajectory of dual use are critical to differentiating it as a health benefit versus harm.

methodsBased within a large, naturalistic randomized controlled trial of e-cigarette in the United States, adults who smoke were given a 1-month sample of tank-style e-cigarette to use as they wish (n = 427) or not (n = 211). Analyses are restricted to participants from the e-cigarette group who became dual users by one month (DU; n = 315) versus participants in control group who exclusively used combustible cigarettes (EUCC; n = 182). Primary outcomes are based on changes in combustible cigarette smoking (cigarettes per day; CPD) across daily diaries within sampling period, and at 3- and 6-month follow-up.

resultsDUs reported significantly more diary days of large smoking reduction (smoking 1-50% of baseline CPD: 23.1% of all diary days) and not smoking (5.6% of all diary days) than did EUCCs (6.8% and 1.4%, respectively) during sampling period (ps < .001). Among DUs, 18.4% reported smoking 1-50% of baseline CPD and 9.5% were not smoking at Week 12; 17.5% reported smoking 1-50% of baseline CPD and 9.2% were not smoking at Week 24. In contrast, among EUCCs, 7.1% reported 1-50% of baseline CPD at Week 12 and 1.7% were not smoking. At Week 24, 8.2% reported 1-50% of baseline CPD and 7.1% were not smoking. Among DUs, e-cigarette use days were associated with greater probability of non-smoking days (8%) than non-e-cigarette use days (3%, p < .001).

conclusionCompared to continued cigarette smoking, initiating dual use reduced smoking and increased cigarette-free days.

Indexed as

Cigarette SmokingElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsSmoking CessationSmoking ReductionVapingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40037836
PMCPMC12370471

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.