Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40038294›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The impact of the hierarchical medical system on medical resource allocation in China.

Liping Fu, Ruizhen Wang, Yu Dong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Liping FuCenter for Social Science Survey and Data, Tianjin University, 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300072, China.
Ruizhen WangCenter for Social Science Survey and Data, Tianjin University, 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300072, China. wangruizhen@tju.edu.cn.
Yu DongCenter for Social Science Survey and Data, Tianjin University, 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300072, China.

Funding

National Social Science Fund of China,China 20AGL034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The disparity in medical resource distribution across regions poses a significant challenge to healthcare reform in China. To address this, China has introduced the hierarchical medical system (HMS). This study evaluates the HMS's impact on the equitable distribution of medical resources. We employ the Theil index to quantify the equalization of resources among cities within provinces and use a multi-period difference-in-differences model to assess the HMS's influence. Our findings indicate that the HMS has significantly contributed to the equal distribution of medical material resources, although its effect on medical human resources is less pronounced. Additionally, we explore the influencing factors of the HMS from the perspective of supply and demand and find that it is more effective in areas with abundant resources and high demand for high-level medical services. More importantly, the HMS has played an important role in mitigating medical disparities in regions with unbalanced economic statuses. These insights are instrumental for policymakers, guiding the evolution of healthcare reforms and the refinement of the HMS to achieve the objective of universal health coverage.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareResource AllocationChinaHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Care ReformHumansChinaDifference-in-differencesEqualizationHierarchical medical systemMedical resources

Identifiers

PMID40038294
PMCPMC11880513

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.