ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
Higher relative fat mass was associated with a higher prevalence of gallstones in US adults.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Body fat ratio and gallstone disease risk: A cross-sectional study identifying a nonlinear risk threshold at 29.1.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsOur study aimed to investigate the association between the relative fat mass (RFM) and gallstones in adults.
methodsInformation obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017-2023 was utilized to examine the correlation between RFM and gallstones based on weighted multivariable regression analysis, smoothing curve fitting, and threshold effect analyses. Using subgroup analysis and interaction tests, we investigated whether this association remained consistent across different populations. We evaluated the effectiveness of RFM and Body Mass Index (BMI) in detecting gallstones through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and by calculating the area under the curve (AUC).
resultsThe study involved 7618 participants in total. RFM mean was 30.74 ± 5.68. Based on the fully adjusted model, gallstone prevalence was positively associated with RFM (OR = 1.09; 95% CI: 1.07-1.11; p < 0.001), with a 9% increase for each unit increase in RFM. This correlation was particularly evident among individuals under the age of 40 and among females. Smoothing curve fitting revealed a nonlinear association between RFM and the occurrence of gallstones, with an inflection point identified at 19.8. Additionally, ROC analysis showed that RFM (AUC = 0.674) outperformed BMI (AUC = 0.634) as a predictor of gallstone formation.
conclusionsHigher RFM was associated with higher gallstone prevalence. RFM may be a more useful tool for gallstone prediction than BMI in the general population. Gallstones may be alleviated or improved by RFM management at an early age. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.