Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40038786›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2025

Bridging the gap: empowering patients as research partners through a structured training program.

Ashley Redding, Leah Copeland, Dana Murphy, Karen Clemmons-Lloyd, Kimberly Cummings, John Doyle, Sandy Kesavan, VeRonica Mitchell, Deyal Riley, Linda Stechison and 1 more

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evolving Roles for Patients as Partners in a National Kidney Health Research Network: A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ashley ReddingPublic Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA. areddin1@hfhs.org.
Leah CopelandPublic Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
Dana MurphyPublic Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
Karen Clemmons-LloydPatient Advisor Program, Patient Engaged Research Center, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
Kimberly CummingsPatient Advisor Program, Patient Engaged Research Center, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
John DoylePatient Advisor Program, Patient Engaged Research Center, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
Sandy KesavanPatient Advisor Program, Patient Engaged Research Center, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
VeRonica MitchellPatient Advisor Program, Patient Engaged Research Center, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
Deyal RileyPatient Advisor Program, Patient Engaged Research Center, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
Linda StechisonPatient Advisor Program, Patient Engaged Research Center, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
Sara SantarossaPublic Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute SOE-2022C2-28911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEngaging patients as partners in the research process is a mutually beneficial endeavor. However, patients may need skills training in order to meaningfully contribute to a project. The present paper describes the training program "A Front Row SEAT to Research," which equipped patient partners to independently lead focus groups and interpret their associated data. The focus groups were an aim of a larger project evaluating the face validity of a scale measuring patient engagement in research. MAIN BODY: The nine-week training program, created by Patient Engaged Research Center qualitative research experts, empowered patient partners to conduct qualitative research. The structure of the program included asynchronous video lessons, workbook exercises, and live sessions for practice. Topics covered included a comprehensive overview of the scientific process, qualitative research methods, focus group moderation, planning, coding, data interpretation, and dissemination of findings. A hands-on approach to learning, coupled with the collection of continuous feedback, were hallmarks of the program.

conclusionThe training program emphasized clear expectations, accessibility, and providing resources to build the capacity of patient partners. Trust was established through a dedicated support person, a collaborative group dynamic, and regular engagement, ensuring patient partners felt valued and empowered. This approach allowed patients to meaningfully contribute to the research and develop a sense of shared ownership in the project.

Indexed as

Focus groupsPatient empowermentPatient engagementPatient involvementStakeholder participationTeaching

Identifiers

PMID40038786
PMCPMC11881312

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.