ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2025
Bridging the gap: empowering patients as research partners through a structured training program.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolving Roles for Patients as Partners in a National Kidney Health Research Network: A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Mixed identity is an identity: embracing the people involved in research partnerships.BMJ open · 2025Review
- Designing Patient-Friendly Messages: Tutorial on Applying Human-Centered, Self-Determination Theory With AI Considerations.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEngaging patients as partners in the research process is a mutually beneficial endeavor. However, patients may need skills training in order to meaningfully contribute to a project. The present paper describes the training program "A Front Row SEAT to Research," which equipped patient partners to independently lead focus groups and interpret their associated data. The focus groups were an aim of a larger project evaluating the face validity of a scale measuring patient engagement in research. MAIN BODY: The nine-week training program, created by Patient Engaged Research Center qualitative research experts, empowered patient partners to conduct qualitative research. The structure of the program included asynchronous video lessons, workbook exercises, and live sessions for practice. Topics covered included a comprehensive overview of the scientific process, qualitative research methods, focus group moderation, planning, coding, data interpretation, and dissemination of findings. A hands-on approach to learning, coupled with the collection of continuous feedback, were hallmarks of the program.
conclusionThe training program emphasized clear expectations, accessibility, and providing resources to build the capacity of patient partners. Trust was established through a dedicated support person, a collaborative group dynamic, and regular engagement, ensuring patient partners felt valued and empowered. This approach allowed patients to meaningfully contribute to the research and develop a sense of shared ownership in the project.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.