Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40038849›Full record

ArticlemAbs2025

An antibody developability triaging pipeline exploiting protein language models.

James Sweet-Jones, Andrew C R Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mAbs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James Sweet-JonesInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Division of Biosciences, University College London, London, UK.
Andrew C R MartinInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Division of Biosciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2835-2572

Funding

BBSRC LIDo program under Grant BB/T008709/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are a successful class of biologic drugs that are frequently selected from phage display libraries and transgenic mice that produce fully human antibodies. However, binding affinity to the correct epitope is necessary, but not sufficient, for a mAb to have therapeutic potential. Sequence and structural features affect the developability of an antibody, which influences its ability to be produced at scale and enter trials, or can cause late-stage failures. Using data on paired human antibody sequences, we introduce a pipeline using a machine learning approach that exploits protein language models to identify antibodies which cluster with antibodies that have entered the clinic and are therefore expected to have developability features similar to clinically acceptable antibodies, and triage out those without these features. We propose this pipeline as a useful tool in candidate selection from large libraries, reducing the cost of exploration of the antibody space, and pursuing new therapeutics.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalMachine LearningAnimalsHumansMicePeptide LibraryAntibodies, MonoclonalPeptide LibraryAntibodiesdevelopabilitymachine learningpredictionprotein language models

Identifiers

PMID40038849
PMCPMC11901365

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.