ReviewEpigenomics2025
Circulating non-coding RNAs as a tool for liquid biopsy in solid tumors.
Review in Epigenomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exosomal hsa-miR-3649 and hsa-miR-202-3p in Gastric Juice as Potential Biomarkers for Functional Dyspepsia with a Previous Helicobacter pylori Infection.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
- Liquid biopsy, multi-cancer early detection, and artificial intelligence: new frontiers in cancer screening from a technological and immunological perspective.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- RNA on Display: Cell Surface RNA as a Novel Layer of Cellular Regulation.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Long non-coding RNA-based single and combination independent prognostic biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Circulating miRNA Profile in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients with Stress, Anxiety, and Depression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Solid tumors are significant causes of global mortality and morbidity. Recent research has primarily concentrated on finding pathology-specific molecules that can be acquired non-invasively and that can change as the disease progresses or in response to treatment. The focus of research has moved to RNA molecules that are either freely circulating in body fluids or bundled in microvesicles and exosomes because of their great stability in challenging environments, ease of accessibility, and changes in level in response to therapy. In this context, there are many non-coding RNAs that can be used for this purpose in liquid biopsies. Out of these, microRNAs have been extensively studied. However, there has been an increase of interest in studying long non-coding RNAs, piwi interacting RNAs, circular RNAs, and other small non-coding RNAs. In this article, an overview of the most researched circulating non-coding RNAs in solid tumors will be reviewed, along with a discussion of the significance of these molecules for early diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic targets. The publications analyzed were extracted from the PubMed database between 2008 and June 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.