Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40040865›Full record

ReviewBrain, behavior, & immunity - health2025

Immune-neuroendocrine crosstalk in mood and psychotic disorders: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Minne Van Den Noortgate, Filip Van Den Eede, Violette Coppens, Erik J Giltay, Livia De Picker, Manuel Morrens

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain, behavior, & immunity - health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Minne Van Den NoortgateCollaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute (CAPRI), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Filip Van Den EedeCollaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute (CAPRI), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Violette CoppensCollaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute (CAPRI), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Erik J GiltayCollaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute (CAPRI), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Livia De PickerCollaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute (CAPRI), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Manuel MorrensCollaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute (CAPRI), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bidirectional interactions between immune and neuroendocrine mechanisms are involved in mood and psychotic disorders, although individual studies report inconsistent and even contradictory findings on the nature of this crosstalk. Our objective was to perform an up to date systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and immune system functioning in mood and psychotic disorders. Methods: We searched the Pubmed, Web of Science and Embase databases for studies reporting correlations between one or more HPA- and immune markers (IM) in patients with mood or psychotic disorders. We analyzed unchallenged correlations as well as challenge studies investigating the HPA-immune interaction through dexamethasone (DEX) and/or CRH suppression, HPA-mediated challenge of immune cell proliferation, immune challenges, or psychological stressors. Finally, genetic studies focusing on HPA x immune interrelation were evaluated. For meta-analyzable data, three primary outcome measures were defined for immune functioning, namely the pro-inflammatory index (PII) and anti-inflammatory index (AII) for the molecular IM and a composite cellular immune marker score (CCIM) for the cellular IM. Secondary analyses were performed for the individual molecular and cellular IM. Heterogeneity was evaluated with the I Results: 93 studies (n = 8226) were included, of which 50 (n = 5649) contained meta-analyzable data. The majority of the included studies (k = 72) investigated major depressive disorder (MDD) patients, nineteen schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) and six bipolar disorder (BD). Under physiological conditions, a poor association was found between cortisol and the PII only in the unmedicated subsample of MDD (k = 8; n = 425; r = .205; z = 2.151; p = .031) and the medicated subsample of SSD (k = 4; n = 152; r = .0.237; z = 2.314; p = .021). No significant correlation was found in MDD between the AII and cortisol (k = 3; n = 1243; r = .005; z = .188; p = .851). Similar results were found for the association between immune cell numbers and cortisol in both MDD (k = 10; n = 773; r = -.005; z = -.113; p = .894) and SSD (k = 4; n = 99; r = .167; z = 1.356; p = .175). A total of 42 studies discussed post-challenge associations between immune alterations and HPA disturbances, of which 12 (n = 389; all MDD) contained meta-analyzable data and 37 entered the systematic review (n = 1783). No post-DEX correlations were found between cortisol and PII (k = 3; n = 105; r = .074; z = .355; p = .722) or CCIM (k = 5; n = 259; r = -.153; z = -1.294; p = .196). However, a significant association was found between post-DEX cortisol/ACTH and PII produced by stimulated blood cells in vitro (k = 3; n = 61; r = .508; z = 4.042; p < .001) as well as for cortisol and CCIM score in MDD after in vitro mitogen stimulation (k = 4; n = 90; r = -.309; z = -2498; p = .012). Following a psychological stressor (k = 6; n = 121), cortisol responses tended to be blunted in all included pathologies, while immune activation was comparable to healthy controls. Genetic studies (k = 7; n = 464) demonstrate altered gene expression of glucocorticoid receptors (GR) in peripheral immune cells in MDD. Heterogeneity over studies tended to be moderate to high. Discussion: The main limitations are the heterogeneity of outcome measures (both HPA and IM) and small sample sizes of the included studies. We conclude that, in physiological conditions, associations between HPA-axis and molecular or cellular IM are absent or poor in both MDD and SSD and psychotropic medication may influence this crosstalk differently in both patient groups. Studies using challenge paradigms in MDD populations did reveal differences in the HPA-immune crosstalk. The normally expected decrease in lymphocytes after DEX distribution tended to be less pronounced in MDD, especially in glucocorticoid-insensitive non-suppressors. It is recommended that future studies should be properly powered and assess HPA functioning using multiple cortisol assessments. Challenge studies are probably more useful than baseline biomarker studies and cellular IM are more informative than molecular IM. It is recommended to broadly assess leucocyte function and, when possible, perform subgroup analyses based on HPA- and/or immune function.

Indexed as

Bipolar disorderCortisolHPA-AxisImmune systemInflammationMajor depressive disorderMeta-analysisSchizophreniaSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40040865
PMCPMC11879693

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.