ArticleHeliyon2025
Reliability and validity of a video-based markerless motion capture system in young healthy subjects.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-11-14Concerns/Issues about Authorship/Affiliation · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Objections by Author(s) · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gait analysis is widely utilized for the diagnosis and prognosis of various diseases. Recently, innovative convenient markerless motion capture systems have been developed to replace the traditional marker-based three-dimensional motion capture systems. Purpose: s:This study is to evaluate the test-retest reliability of a novel video-based markerless motion capture system(Watrix, China) and to assess its concordance with a three-dimensional motion analysis system (BTS, Italy) in a population of young healthy subjects. Participants and methods: Our study included 36 healthy adult participants. Each subject underwent three assessments using Watrix system and BTS system. To evaluate the validity and reliability of the measurements, we employed paired-sample t-tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, intra-class correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman analysis and Passing Bablok regression analysis. Results: Both intra-rater and inter-rater reliability demonstrated moderate to excellent correlations, with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values ranging from 0.507 to 0.936, except for cadence(ICC = 0.233). The validity exhibited a good correlation for sagittal plane parameters(ICC ranging from 0.818 to 0.883) and a moderate correlation for the coronal and transverse parameters (ICC ranging from 0.520 to 0.608). The Passing Bablok linear regression analysis indicated that the confidence intervals for the intercepts of all parameters included 0, while the confidence intervals for the slopes of most parameters encompassed 1 except for step width, pelvic obliquity, and hip adduction-abduction angle. The implementation of Watrix system significantly decreased the testing duration for participants. Conclusions: The Watrix system demonstrated relatively high test-retest reliability. The Watrix and BTS systems demonstrated moderate to good agreement for most parameters. However, the Watrix system tended to underestimate coronal and transverse plane parameters, resulting in lower consistency. In addition, the markerless motion capture system greatly reduces the testing duration.Optimizing algorithms to improve recognition accuracy remains the main direction of research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.