ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Comparison of gluteal muscle central activation in individuals with and without patellofemoral pain.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects of blood flow restriction exercise interventions on patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy of an 8-week core stability program versus foot-ankle strengthening on pain, function, and distal structural parameters in individuals with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Intracortical inhibition, corticospinal excitability and voluntary activation in people with and without patellofemoral pain.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is often linked to knee valgus during weight-bearing activities, commonly attributed to gluteal muscle weakness. However, recent research suggests that central nervous system adaptations may also influence muscle function and movement patterns in individuals with PFP. This study compared the central activation ratio (CAR) of the gluteus medius and gluteus maximus between individuals with and without PFP, and assessed the associations between gluteal CAR, frontal plane projection angle of the trunk and lower extremity, and knee function. Twelve individuals without PFP and 10 individuals with PFP participated. We tested CAR of the gluteal muscles with a superimposed burst protocol during a maximum voluntary isometric contraction and evaluated frontal plane kinematics of the trunk and lower extremities during five single leg tasks. Participants with PFP also completed the Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS). Independent t-tests compared CAR between groups, and Pearson correlation coefficients evaluated the associations between CAR, frontal plane kinematics, and AKPS. Individuals with PFP tended to have lower gluteus maximus CAR, though the difference was not statistically significant (PFP: 90.8% ± 7.0%, Control: 94.4% ± 3.0%; p = 0.067). CAR of both the gluteus maximus (R = 0.790, p = 0.003) and gluteus medius (R = 0.584, p = 0.038) were significantly correlated with AKPS scores, and gluteus maximus CAR was associated with trunk lean angle during single leg landing (R = 0.533, p = 0.006). Our data suggest that higher gluteal CAR is associated with better function in individuals with PFP. Lower gluteus maximus CAR contributes to ipsilateral trunk lean during single leg landing, potentially to reduce external hip moments and muscle demand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.