Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40041887›Full record

ReviewActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B2025

Advances and prospects of RNA delivery nanoplatforms for cancer therapy.

Mohamed S Attia, Gregor Kijanka, Nam-Trung Nguyen, Jun Zhang, Hongjie An

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohamed S AttiaQueensland Micro and Nanotechnology Centre, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia.
Gregor KijankaQueensland Micro and Nanotechnology Centre, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia.
Nam-Trung NguyenQueensland Micro and Nanotechnology Centre, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia.
Jun ZhangQueensland Micro and Nanotechnology Centre, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia.
Hongjie AnQueensland Micro and Nanotechnology Centre, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern oncology is rapidly evolving, driven by recent advances in RNA-based therapeutics. As new emerging cutting-edge technology, mRNA vaccines hold excellent promise for encoding immunostimulatory molecules, tumor-associated antigens, neoantigens, and chimeric antigen receptors for T-cell reprogramming. RNA interference tools enable highly effective post-transcriptional gene silencing that has rapidly progressed towards more tailored antitumor treatments targeting key molecular players in tumor progression and drug resistance. The inherent challenges and limitations of RNA-based tools, such as size, low stability and surface charges hindering direct cell entry, along with the short circulatory half-life and rapid clearance, call for new and improved RNA delivery systems enabling enhanced gene delivery. Nanoplatforms, particularly certain types of lipid, polymeric nanoparticles and inorganic nanoparticles, provide designed means to address the challenges of RNA delivery and cellular uptake. This paper explores the challenges and barriers while giving insight into the future perspective of RNA-based cancer therapeutics in the context of delivery nanoplatforms and the challenges during development.

Indexed as

Cancer therapyGene deliveryGene silencingImmunotherapiesmRNA vaccineNanoplatformsNeoantigensRNA interference

Identifiers

PMID40041887
PMCPMC11873661

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.