Evidence mapPaperPMID 40041906Full record

ReviewActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B2025

Recent advances in the bench-to-bedside translation of cancer nanomedicines.

Yang Liu, Yinchao Zhang, Huikai Li, Tony Y Hu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Nanoparticles: An Emerging Hope in Cancer Therapy.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yang LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Cancer, Liver Cancer Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China.
Yinchao ZhangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Cancer, Liver Cancer Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China.
Huikai LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Cancer, Liver Cancer Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China.
Tony Y HuDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer remains a complex and challenging medical problem, driving extensive research efforts. Despite significant progress in understanding its genetic and molecular aspects, the quest for effective treatments continues. Nanomedicines have shown great potential for revolutionizing cancer treatment by offering targeted and controlled drug delivery, reducing side effects, and improving patient outcomes. Accordingly, nanomedicines have been the focus of extensive research and development for clinical translation. As of September 2024, a search on the ClinicalTrials.gov website using the term "nanoparticles" revealed numerous ongoing and planned clinical trials. Motivated by recent advances in the field, this review explores the current frontier of cancer nanomedicine. Nanomedicines have supported chemotherapy, phototherapy and sonodynamic therapy, nucleic acid therapy, and immunotherapy. However, translating nanomedicines into practice has been challenged by complex interactions between nanoparticles and biological systems, variable permeability and retention of nanoparticles in tumors, safety concerns, difficulty achieving targeted delivery, and issues with scaling up manufacturing. Perspectives on addressing these challenges are offered. Future opportunities for cancer nanomedicines, including modifying the tumor microenvironment, integrating artificial intelligence and big data, and targeting new medical areas, are also discussed. This review underscores the potential of cancer nanomedicines to revolutionize treatment from a clinical standpoint.

Indexed as

AnticancerCancer nanomedicinesClinical nanotechnologyClinical translationClinical trial landscapeCombination therapiesDrug delivery systemsTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID40041906
PMCPMC11873642

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.