Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40042073›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2025

Associations Between Exercise Training, Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour and Mortality: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses.

Masoud Rahmati, Hyeri Lee, Hayeon Lee, Jaeyu Park, Djandan Tadum Arthur Vithran, Yusheng Li, Abdolreza Kazemi, Laurent Boyer, Guillaume Fond, Lee Smith and 7 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Masoud RahmatiCEReSS-Health Service Research and Quality of Life Center, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4792-027X
Hyeri LeeCenter for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hayeon LeeCenter for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jaeyu ParkCenter for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Djandan Tadum Arthur VithranDepartment of Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yusheng LiDepartment of Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Abdolreza KazemiDepartment of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Vali-E-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran.
Laurent BoyerCEReSS-Health Service Research and Quality of Life Center, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Guillaume FondCEReSS-Health Service Research and Quality of Life Center, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Lee SmithCentre for Health, Performance and Wellbeing, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Nicola VeroneseSaint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, Rome, Italy.
Pinar SoysalDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Elena DragiotiPain and Rehabilitation Centre, and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linkoping University, Linkoping, Sweden.
Samuele CorteseDevelopmental EPI (Evidence synthesis, Prediction, Implementation) Lab, Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, School of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Jiseung KangDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Dong Keon YonCenter for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1628-9948
Marco SolmiOn Track: The Champlain First Episode Psychosis Program, Department of Mental Health, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Ministry of Health and Welfare and Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea HU23C0061National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2023-00248157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNumerous studies support the association of exercise training, physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour (SB) with both mortality and morbidity outcomes. The results across studies have been inconsistent, and no umbrella reviews have yet been conducted on this topic.

methodsWe conducted an umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies by screening articles in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science databases from inception to 30 April 2024. Quality appraisal of each included meta-analysis was done using the AMSTAR 2 tool, with evidence certainty evaluated based on statistical significance, study size, heterogeneity, small-study effects, prediction intervals (PI) and potential biases.

resultsFrothy-eight meta-analyses were included (AMSTAR 2 ratings: high 25, moderate 10, low 2 and critically low 11). No evidence was highly suggestive or convincing. Suggestive evidence linked any PA and SB to lower and higher risks of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality. Suggestive evidence indicated a significant association between self-reported and device-measured total PA (equivalent odds ratio [eOR] 0.78 [0.70-0.86] and eHR = 0.50 [0.38-0.65], respectively), self-reported leisure time PA (eHR = 0.73 [0.66-0.80]), device-measured daily steps (eHR = 0.44 [0.35-0.56]) and aerobic plus resistance training (eHR = 0.60 [0.56-0.64]) with lower all-cause mortality. Weak evidence supported links between self-reported and device-measured SB and higher mortality (eHR = 1.3 [1.22-1.38] and eHR = 2.16 [1.09-4.28], respectively). Suggestive evidence was noted for the association between self-reported leisure time PA (eHR = 0.74 [0.69-0.80]) and resistance training (eHR = 0.82 [0.81-0.84]) with cardiovascular mortality. Suggestive evidence was also found for the association between self-reported leisure time PA (eHR = 0.87 [0.83-0.91]) with cancer mortality. Associations between self-reported running time and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and cancer did not reach statistical significance nor did the association between low skeletal muscle mass and all-cause mortality. Meta-regression analyses showed that physical activity reduces mortality risk, with age reducing the protective effects against all-cause, CVD and cancer mortality. We also found that combined exercise training (aerobic plus resistance) most effectively reduces all-cause and CVD mortality.

conclusionsConverging evidence supports that physical activity and sedentary behaviour are associated with lower and higher rates of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality. More high-quality prospective studies are needed for a better understanding of the associations between running time and also TV-viewing time and health-related outcomes.

Indexed as

ExerciseSedentary BehaviorHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicAll‐cause mortalityCancer mortalityCardiovascular disease mortalityExercise trainingPhysical activitySedentary behavior

Identifiers

PMID40042073
PMCPMC11880915

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.