SynthesisInternal medicine journal2025
Haematological malignancies during pregnancy: a systematic review of necessary services in the Australian context.
Synthesis in Internal medicine journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protective effect of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) against prenatal cytarabine exposure-induced developmental toxicity in SD rat.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Cancer in Pregnancy: Therapeutic Decisions at the Intersection of Two Lives.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- An Account of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Complicating Pregnancy and Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHaematological malignancies diagnosed during pregnancy are rare, with increasing incidence, presenting unique therapeutic, social and ethical challenges for treating teams, patients and their family. There are no national guidelines regarding appropriate referral pathways, resources and services for the management of these patients.
aimsTo conduct a systematic review of the literature to identify the multidisciplinary team members required for optimal care of pregnant patients with haematological malignancies. These data will be used to evaluate the capabilities of Australian health networks to provide coordinated care.
methodsA systematic review of the literature in MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases was conducted. Eligible studies focused on pregnant Australian patients with haematological malignancies, exploring care models, specialist teams and services utilised. This was then used to generate a map of Australian hospitals that can service this patient demographic.
resultsEssential team members include haematologists, maternal-fetal medicine specialists, anaesthetists, midwives, intensive care specialists, psychologists and social workers. Services utilised include haematology, maternity, intensive care, tertiary imaging, operating theatre, pharmacy and perinatal mental health services. Utilising these data, 25 hospitals can manage these patients.
conclusionsThis study identified the necessary healthcare practitioners, services and hospitals available that can manage this patient cohort. Future research should focus on determining ideal treatment regimens, timing of therapy throughout gestation, establishing a national patient registry and implementing a cancer care plan and frameworks for best practice care. A centralised referral pathway leveraging telehealth will allow expedient, multidisciplinary action and equity in access to all women across Australia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.