Trial reportAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2025
Burden and care time for dementia caregivers in the LIVE@Home.Path trial.
Trial report in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04043364 (LIVE@Home.Path), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
LIVE@Home.Path: a Mixed Method, Stepped Wedge and Randomized Controlled Trial Innovating the Clinical Pathway for Home-dwelling Persons With Dementia and Their Families
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Burden and care time for dementia caregivers in the LIVE@Home.Path trial.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Trial
- Predictive Model of Acupuncture Adherence in Alzheimer Disease: Secondary Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.JMIR aging · 2026Article
- Evidence-based care pathways for people with dementia and neurodegenerative disorders in Europe: a systematic review of models, integration of digital technologies, and quality indicators.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Pain in people with dementia is a significant contributor to increased professional caregiver burden: results of an observation study.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionWe investigated the effectiveness of the multicomponent learning, innovation, volunteer support, empowerment (LIVE) intervention on caregiver burden and care time in dyads of home-dwelling people with dementia and caregivers.
methodA 24 month, multicenter, stepped-wedge trial, randomized dyads to receive the 6-month LIVE intervention by municipal coordinators (May 2019 to December 2021). Primary outcomes were caregiver burden assessed by Relative Stress Scale (RSS) and informal care time spent on personal activities assessed by Resource Utilization in Dementia Personal Activities of Daily Living (RUD-PADL). Analyses used an intention-to-treat.
resultsTwo hundred eighty dyads were enrolled. Caregivers during the intervention period reported lower levels of RSS of 0.7 points (standard deviation [SD]: 0.8) compared to the caregivers in the control period. Caregivers during the intervention period reported more time spent on PADL of 11.7 hours/month (SD: 8.7) compared to caregivers during the control period; both were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). DISCUSSION: The LIVE intervention did not reduce caregiver burden or care time.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04043364. HIGHLIGHTS: Two hundred eighty persons with dementia and caregivers were included in a stepped wedge randomized controlled trial. We used the learning, innovation, volunteer support, empowerment (LIVE) intervention. The LIVE intervention did not reduce caregiver burden or informal care time. The LIVE intervention improved the caregiver's clinical global impression of change. Positive change was most pronounced for coordinator personalized support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.