Evidence mapPaperPMID 40042613Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2025

[Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a new pharmacological treatment option for psychiatric illnesses?]

Hubertus Himmerich

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hubertus HimmerichCentre for Research in Eating and Weight Disorders (CREW), Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, SE5 8AB, London, Großbritannien. hubertus.himmerich@kcl.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Albiglutide, dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, lixisenatide, orforglipron and semaglutide are glucagon-like peptide‑1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists. Tirzepatide targets not only GLP‑1 but also glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) receptors and retatrutide is a triple GLP‑1, GIP and glucagon receptor agonist. The GLP‑1 receptor agonists increase insulin release but suppress glucagon release. They slow down the emptying of the stomach and thus prevent blood sugar spikes. They reduce appetite and food intake. In the brain GLP‑1 receptor agonists lead to a better glycemic control and they appear to have anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects. It has been reported that GLP‑1 receptor agonists reduce oxidative stress and apoptosis, lower the risk of ischemia and promote neurogenesis. The GLP‑1 receptor agonists can also influence dopaminergic signal transduction in the nucleus accumbens. Therefore, they could modify the effect of cocaine, alcohol and nicotine. Preliminary investigations provide indications of the therapeutic benefits of GLP‑1 receptor agonists for people with dementia, eating disorders, psychopharmacologically induced weight gain, depression, anxiety and substance use disorders. Typical accompanying adverse reactions are gastrointestinal side effects, such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, eructation and gastroesophageal reflux. More severe side effects include pancreatitis, allergic reactions, renal function disorders and possibly an increased risk of thyroid cancer.

Indexed as

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsMental DisordersEvidence-Based MedicineHumansHypoglycemic AgentsTreatment OutcomeGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsHypoglycemic AgentsBinge eating disorderDementiaDepressionDiabetesSubstance use disorders

Identifiers

PMID40042613
PMCPMC12058874

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.