Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40042890›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

A deep learning framework for automated and generalized synaptic event analysis.

Philipp S O'Neill, Martín Baccino-Calace, Peter Rupprecht, Sungmoo Lee, Yukun A Hao, Michael Z Lin, Rainer W Friedrich, Martin Mueller, Igor Delvendahl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Widely Used CaMKII Regulatory Segment Mutations Cause Tight Actinin Binding and Dendritic Spine Enlargement in Unstimulated Neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. In vivo microelectrode arrays for neuroscience.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Philipp S O'NeillDepartment of Molecular Life Sciences, University of Zurich (UZH), Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9208-7304
Martín Baccino-CalaceDepartment of Molecular Life Sciences, University of Zurich (UZH), Zurich, Switzerland.
Peter RupprechtNeuroscience Center Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8235-8257
Sungmoo LeeDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
Yukun A HaoDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
Michael Z LinDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0492-1961
Rainer W FriedrichFriedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9107-0482
Martin MuellerDepartment of Molecular Life Sciences, University of Zurich (UZH), Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1624-6761
Igor DelvendahlDepartment of Molecular Life Sciences, University of Zurich (UZH), Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6151-2363

Funding

Optimization of genetically encoded voltage and neurotransmitter indicators for multiwavelength in vivo analysis of brain circuitsUM1MH136462 · NIMH · MAX PLANCK FLORIDA CORPORATION · PI Michael Z. Lin, Kaspar Podgorski · 2024 to 2026
$6.3M
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 535029399Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 535030493European Research Council 742576NIH HHS 1UM1MH136462NIMH NIH HHS UM1 MH136462Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 310030B_152833/1Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung PZ00P3_174018Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung PZ00P3_209114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative information about synaptic transmission is key to our understanding of neural function. Spontaneously occurring synaptic events carry fundamental information about synaptic function and plasticity. However, their stochastic nature and low signal-to-noise ratio present major challenges for the reliable and consistent analysis. Here, we introduce miniML, a supervised deep learning-based method for accurate classification and automated detection of spontaneous synaptic events. Comparative analysis using simulated ground-truth data shows that miniML outperforms existing event analysis methods in terms of both precision and recall. miniML enables precise detection and quantification of synaptic events in electrophysiological recordings. We demonstrate that the deep learning approach generalizes easily to diverse synaptic preparations, different electrophysiological and optical recording techniques, and across animal species. miniML provides not only a comprehensive and robust framework for automated, reliable, and standardized analysis of synaptic events, but also opens new avenues for high-throughput investigations of neural function and dysfunction.

Indexed as

Deep LearningSynapsesSynaptic TransmissionAnimalsNeuronsdata analysisD. melanogasterelectrophysiologyhumanimagingmachine learningmouseneuronsneurosciencesynaptic transmissionzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID40042890
PMCPMC11882139

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.