Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40042953›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2025

mmWave Radar for Sit-to-Stand Analysis: A Comparative Study With Wearables and Kinect.

Shuting Hu, Peggy Ackun, Xiang Zhang, Siyang Cao, Jennifer Barton, Melvin G Hector, Mindy J Fain, Nima Toosizadeh

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shuting Hu
Peggy Ackun
Xiang Zhang
Siyang Cao
Jennifer Barton
Melvin G Hector
Mindy J Fain
Nima Toosizadeh

Funding

WARE-Care: a novel RF-based system to assess and prevent fallingR21EB033454 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI CAO, SIYANG · 2022 to 2024
$583k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB033454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates a novel approach for analyzing Sit-to-Stand (STS) movements using millimeter-wave (mmWave) radar technology, aiming to develop a non-contact, privacy-preserving, and all-day operational solution for healthcare applications. A 60 GHz mmWave radar system was employed to collect radar point cloud data from 45 participants performing STS motions. Using a deep learning-based pose estimation model and Inverse Kinematics (IK), we calculated joint angles, segmented STS motions, and extracted clinically relevant features for fall risk assessment. The extracted features were compared with those obtained from Kinect and wearable sensors. While Kinect provided a reference for motion capture, we acknowledge its limitations compared to the gold-standard VICON system, which is planned for future validation. The results demonstrated that mmWave radar effectively captures general motion patterns and large joint movements (e.g., trunk), though challenges remain for more fine-grained motion analysis. This study highlights the unique advantages and limitations of mmWave radar and other sensors, emphasizing the potential of integrated sensor technologies to enhance the accuracy and reliability of motion analysis in clinical and biomedical research. Future work will expand the scope to more complex movements and incorporate high-precision motion capture systems to further validate the findings.

Indexed as

Motion CaptureRadarSitting PositionStanding PositionWearable Electronic DevicesAdolescentAdultAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaDeep LearningFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMovementSignal Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID40042953
PMCPMC12418803

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.