ArticleExperimental hematology & oncology2025
Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of efficacy and safety of lisocabtagene maraleucel and mosunetuzumab for the treatment of third-line or later relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma.
Article in Experimental hematology & oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase I/II Trial Evaluating the Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Escalating Doses of Mosunetuzumab (BTCT4465A) as a Single Agent and Combined With Atezolizumab in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
A Phase 2, Open-label, Single Arm, Multicohort, Multicenter Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of JCAR017 in Adult Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Indolent B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL)
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy vs. CD20xCD3 bispecific antibody as third- or later-line treatment in follicular lymphoma: a meta-analysis.Annals of hematology · 2026Pooled it
- Treatment and survival outcomes for patients with follicular lymphoma and POD24: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Blood advances · 2026Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of comparing CAR-T and bispecific antibody therapy in relapsed/refractory indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Pooled it
- CAR T-cells vs. bispecific antibodies as third- or later-line treatment for relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: a literature review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Lisocabtagene maraleucel in follicular lymphoma: the phase 2 TRANSCEND FL study.Nature medicine · 2024Trial
- Mosunetuzumab: A bispecific CD20 × CD3 antibody for follicular lymphoma with promising evidence in other B-NHL subtypes.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Review
- Follicular Lymphoma: Novel Therapies and Strategies for Optimal Therapeutic Sequencing.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Article
- CAR T-cells in hematologic malignancies: Advances, challenges, and future directions.iScience · 2026Review
- Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel Versus Idecabtagene Vicleucel in Triple-Class-Exposed Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma with 2-4 Prior Lines of Therapy: Updated Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Review
- Comparative Analysis of Bispecific Antibodies and CAR T-Cell Therapy in Follicular Lymphoma.European journal of haematology · 2025Review
- Microbial metabolites and their influence on the tumor microenvironment.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Updates on Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cells in Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- The landscape of T-cell engagers for the treatment of follicular lymphoma.Oncoimmunology · 2024Review
- The treatment of follicular lymphoma with CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe treatment landscape for relapsed or refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) has changed with the introduction of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies, including lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) and CD20 × CD3 bispecific T-cell-engaging monoclonal antibodies such as mosunetuzumab. Liso-cel and mosunetuzumab have demonstrated positive benefit-risk profiles for third-line or later (3L+) treatment of patients with R/R FL and are approved treatments for these patients. In the absence of a prospective, randomized study, we conducted an unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) to assess the efficacy and safety of liso-cel and mosunetuzumab for 3L+ treatment in patients with R/R FL.
methodsUnanchored MAICs were performed to estimate relative treatment effects between TRANSCEND FL (NCT04245839) and GO29781 (NCT02500407). For TRANSCEND FL, the leukapheresis set (N = 114) was used for primary comparisons of the following efficacy endpoints: objective response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, duration of response (DOR), and progression-free survival (PFS). The treated set (N = 107) was used for comparisons of the following safety endpoints: cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurological events (NE), serious infections, and use of corticosteroids or tocilizumab for CRS. Sensitivity analyses were conducted for efficacy using the TRANSCEND FL treated efficacy set (N = 101).
resultsAfter adjustment, liso-cel was associated with higher ORR (odds ratio [OR] = 3.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48‒9.67]) and CR rate (OR = 6.46, 95% CI 2.85‒14.65), and improved DOR (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.45, 95% CI 0.26‒0.77) and PFS (HR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.16‒0.49) compared with mosunetuzumab. Results remained consistent across sensitivity analyses. Liso-cel had a lower incidence of grade ≥ 3 CRS (OR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.04‒5.13), grade 3‒4 serious infections (OR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.12‒1.03), and corticosteroid use for CRS management (OR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.03‒0.65); however, liso-cel exhibited higher incidence of any-grade CRS (OR = 1.86, 95% CI 1.01‒3.43), any-grade NEs (OR = 2.16, 95% CI 0.72‒6.44), and tocilizumab use for CRS management (OR = 2.27, 95% CI 0.86‒5.99).
conclusionsFindings highlight a potential positive benefit-risk profile of liso-cel over mosunetuzumab as a 3L+ treatment for R/R FL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.