ArticleInfluenza and other respiratory viruses2025
The Potential for Twice-Annual Influenza Vaccination to Reduce Disease Burden.
Article in Influenza and other respiratory viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInfluenza vaccination is recommended annually based on the evolving nature of influenza viruses and the waning of vaccine-induced immunity. The timing of vaccination is usually before the winter influenza season in most temperate locations, where the seasonality is clear and influenza activities on average last no longer than 6 months. However, many tropical and subtropical areas have year-round influenza activity and multiple epidemics within 1 year, against which annual influenza vaccination may not offer sufficient protection at the individual level.
aimsA twice-annual vaccination program could utilize standard inactivated influenza vaccines or enhanced influenza vaccines. Here, we discuss three reasons to consider twice-annual vaccination as a strategy to improve protection. DISCUSSION: The first, mentioned above, is that some locations experience prolonged or year-round influenza activity. The second reason is based on the observation that vaccine effectiveness significantly declines about 6 months after vaccination particularly for A(H3N2) strains, and therefore, vaccination twice a year might be beneficial to maintain a higher level of immunity in the second half of each year. The third reason is to allow for receipt of the most updated vaccine strains, given that these are updated twice each year by the World Health Organization. We also discuss three potential barriers or challenges. The first potential challenge is knowledge gaps, because there are very few existing studies that used twice-annual vaccination. The second potential barrier is a concern over whether more frequent vaccination would lead to reduced immunogenicity or reduced clinical protection in the longer term. The third relates to concerns about cost or feasibility.
conclusionWe discuss these issues and recommend comparative assessment of the incremental benefits and cost of twice-annual vaccination versus annual vaccination, as well as other vaccination strategies aiming to reduce influenza disease burden particularly in tropical and subtropical locations where there can be year-round influenza activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.