ArticlePNAS nexus2025
How pore formation in complex biological membranes is governed by lipid composition, mechanics, and lateral sorting.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Molecular Insight to Mesoscale Membrane Remodeling: Curvature Generation by Arginine-Rich Cell-Penetrating Peptides.Small methods · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-responsive liposomes: A mechanistic framework to decode the effects of acoustic parameters.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Bacterial pore-forming toxins: mechanisms and implications for host immunity.Bioscience reports · 2026Review
- A Comprehensive Overview of Antimicrobial Peptides: Broad-Spectrum Activity, Computational Approaches, and Applications.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Elucidating the Impact of Red Blood Cell Membrane Components on Melittin-Induced Pore Formation with Molecular Dynamics Simulations.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
- A unified model of transient poration induced by antimicrobial peptides.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The primary function of biological membranes is to enable compartmentalization among cells and organelles. Loss of integrity by the formation of membrane pores would trigger uncontrolled depolarization or influx of toxic compounds, posing a fatal threat to living cells. How the lipid complexity of biological membranes enables mechanical stability against pore formation while, simultaneously, allowing for ongoing membrane remodeling is largely enigmatic. We performed molecular dynamics simulations of eight complex lipid membranes including the plasma membrane and membranes of the organelles endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi, lysosome, and mitochondrion. To quantify the mechanical stability of these membranes, we computed the free energy of transmembrane pore nucleation as well as the line tension of the rim of open pores. Our simulations reveal that complex biological membranes are remarkably stable, however, with the plasma membrane standing out as exceptionally stable, which aligns with its crucial role as a protective layer. We observe that sterol content is a key regulator for biomembrane stability, and that lateral sorting among lipid mixtures influences the energetics of membrane pores. A comparison of 25 model membranes with varying sterol content, tail length, tail saturation, and head group type shows that the pore nucleation free energy is mostly associated with the lipid tilt modulus, whereas the line tension along the pore rim is determined by the lipid intrinsic curvature. Together, our study provides an atomistic and energetic view on the role of lipid complexity in biomembrane stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.