Evidence mapPaperPMID 40046086Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025

Evaluating the effects of the World Health Organization's online intervention 'iSupport' to reduce depression and distress in dementia carers: a multi-centre six-month randomised controlled trial in the UK.

Gill Windle, Greg Flynn, Zoe Hoare, Nia Goulden, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Bethany Anthony, Patricia Masterson Algar, Suman Kurana, Aimee Spector, Gwenllian Hughes and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effects of a virtual iSupport Program on carers and people with dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Co-designed films to reduce care burden in India: The Moving Pictures pilot trial.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Gill WindleDementia Services Development Centre Wales (DSDC Wales), School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Wales, UK.
Greg FlynnNorth Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health (NWORTH), North Wales Medical School, Bangor University, Wales, UK.
Zoe HoareNorth Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health (NWORTH), North Wales Medical School, Bangor University, Wales, UK.
Nia GouldenNorth Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health (NWORTH), North Wales Medical School, Bangor University, Wales, UK.
Rhiannon Tudor EdwardsCentre for Health Economics & Medicines Evaluation (CHEME), School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Wales, UK.
Bethany AnthonyCentre for Health Economics & Medicines Evaluation (CHEME), School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Wales, UK.
Patricia Masterson AlgarDementia Services Development Centre Wales (DSDC Wales), School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Wales, UK.
Suman KuranaDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, England, UK.
Aimee SpectorDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, England, UK.
Gwenllian HughesDementia Services Development Centre Wales (DSDC Wales), School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Wales, UK.
Ryan InnesDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
John ConnaghanDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Danielle ProctorDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, England, UK.
Fatene Abakar IsmailDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Kiara JacksonDementia Services Development Centre Wales (DSDC Wales), School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Wales, UK.
Kieren EganDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Joshua StottDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, England, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sustaining the capabilities of dementia carers is a global priority. 'iSupport' is a self-guided online intervention designed by the World Health Organization (WHO) to reduce mental health problems in dementia carers. iSupport is undergoing global implementation, however there is an absence of effectiveness evidence. This study tested the effectiveness of iSupport to reduce distress and depression in dementia carers. Methods: A pragmatic randomised controlled trial was conducted in three centres. Adult carers (18+) living in the community were recruited in England, Wales and Scotland and randomly assigned (1:1) through a web-based system to iSupport or usual care. Outcome assessors were masked to allocation. The primary outcomes assessed the difference in distress and depression between baseline and six-months. The target sample size was 350 to enable 90% power, significance at 2.5% including 25% attrition (262 completers) on either outcome. Analysis followed the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle. The trial was registered with ISRCTN registry (17420703). Findings: Between 12th November 2021 and 31st March 2023,177 carers (50.3%) were randomised to usual care and 175 (49.7%) to iSupport. 263 (74.7%) completed the trial. All were included in the ITT analysis. Mean distress scores at six-months were 20.0 (SD = 8.3) for usual care and 20.6 (SD = 8.6) for iSupport. The mean difference was 0.16 (95% CI -1.17 to 1.49, p = 0.29) after adjusting for covariates. Mean depression scores at six-months were 9.5 (SD = 7.0) for usual care and 9.8 (SD = 6.5) for iSupport. The mean difference at six-months was -0.54 (95% CI = -1.70 to 0.62, p = 0.44). No serious adverse events were linked to the trial. Interpretation: To our knowledge this is the largest trial evaluating a self-guided online intervention in UK dementia carers, and the first to successfully evaluate the effectiveness of iSupport. The null findings are significant given the ongoing global implementation of iSupport by the WHO and the adoption of self-guided interventions into mainstream care delivery as part of digital health transformations. Funding: NIHR.

Indexed as

DementiaDigital healthE-HealthFamily carersInformal carersOnline interventionsRandomised controlled trialSelf-guided interventions

Identifiers

PMID40046086
PMCPMC11880890

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.