ArticleHealth information science and systems2025
Enhanced prediction of spine surgery outcomes using advanced machine learning techniques and oversampling methods.
Article in Health information science and systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Hybrid Ensemble Learning Framework for Predicting Lumbar Disc Herniation Recurrence: Integrating Supervised Models, Anomaly Detection, and Threshold Optimization.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Accurate prediction of spine surgery outcomes is essential for optimizing treatment strategies. This study presents an enhanced machine learning approach to classify and predict the success of spine surgeries, incorporating advanced oversampling techniques and grid search optimization to improve model performance. Methods: Various machine learning models, including GaussianNB, ComplementNB, KNN, Decision Tree, KNN with RandomOverSampler, KNN with SMOTE, and grid-searched optimized versions of KNN and Decision Tree, were applied to a dataset of 244 spine surgery patients. The dataset, comprising pre-surgical, psychometric, socioeconomic, and analytical variables, was analyzed to determine the most efficient predictive model. The study explored the impact of different variable groupings and oversampling techniques. Results: Experimental results indicate that the KNN model, especially when enhanced with RandomOverSampler and SMOTE, demonstrated superior performance, achieving accuracy values as high as 76% and an F1-score of 67%. Grid-searched optimized versions of KNN and Decision Tree also yielded significant improvements in predictive accuracy and F1-score. Conclusions: The study highlights the potential of advanced machine learning techniques and oversampling methods in predicting spine surgery outcomes. The results underscore the importance of careful variable selection and model optimization to achieve optimal performance. This system holds promise as a tool to assist healthcare professionals in decision-making, thereby enhancing spine surgery outcomes. Future research should focus on further refining these models and exploring their application across larger datasets and diverse clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.