ArticleAmerican journal of medicine open2025
Prevalence of Meeting Daily Step Count Recommendations in Cardiovascular Patients With and Without Metabolic Syndrome.
Article in American journal of medicine open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: We compared the prevalence of older cardiovascular patients with and without metabolic syndrome (MetS) who met the recommendations of walking more than 7000 and 10,000 steps/d, and we determined whether MetS status was significantly associated with meeting the daily step count recommendations before and after adjusting for demographic variables, comorbid conditions, and cardiovascular risk factors. Methods: Older cardiovascular participants with MetS ( Results: The MetS group took significantly fewer steps/d than the non-MetS control group (7307 ± 3625 vs. 8933 ± 4487 steps/d; Conclusions: Older cardiovascular participants with MetS had an 18 % lower daily step count compared to those without MetS and were less likely to meet the 7000 and 10,000 steps/d recommendations. Additionally, older cardiovascular participants who were least likely to meet the daily step count recommendations included those who had reduced HDL-cholesterol and abdominal obesity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.