Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40046434›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2025

Behavioral and neurobiological implications of kairomones for rodents: an updated review.

Diya Manjunath, Hayavadhan Sampath, Roy N Kirkwood, Sinsha Santhosh, Devaraj Sankarganesh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Diya Manjunath *School of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamilnadu, India.
Hayavadhan Sampath *School of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamilnadu, India.
Roy N KirkwoodSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, SA, Australia.
Sinsha SanthoshSchool of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamilnadu, India.
Devaraj SankarganeshSchool of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamilnadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Like many other vertebrates, rodents communicate via pheromones, which favors intraspecies communication. In contrast, kairomones are semiochemicals involved in interspecific communication, facilitating information between organisms of different species but advantageous for the receiver. Kairomones induce behavioral, physiological, and endocrinological changes in rodents, and have been proven to activate specific neuronal pathways in one or multiple components of the olfactory system (the main olfactory system, accessory olfactory system, and Gruenberg ganglion). The sophisticated olfactory networks help rodents innately recognize kairomones and elicit appropriate behavioral (aversive, avoidance, defense, and escape mechanisms), physiological, and endocrinological changes. Thus far, odor sources (e.g., urine, feces, hair, and body rubbings) of predators, such as felines, canines, and serpentes, have been studied in rodents. Specific kairomones have been identified, behaviorally tested, and validated for their potential to induce behavioral, neuronal, and endocrinological changes in rodents. One of the most studied kairomones is the fox odor, 2,5-dihydro 2,4,5-trimethylthiazoline, although other compounds have been reported to a limited extent. This review summarizes the current knowledge on kairomones and their effects on the behavioral, neuronal, and endocrine systems of rats and mice.

Indexed as

house mouseodorantspest managementpheromonesratrodent controlsulfates

Identifiers

PMID40046434
PMCPMC11880007

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.