ReviewPatient preference and adherence2025
Exploring the Perceptions and Self-Perceptions of Therapeutic Adherence in Older Adults With Chronic Conditions: A Scoping Review.
Review in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Older Adults' Experiences of Commercial Virtual Reality for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Mixed-Methods Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Article
- Factors Influencing Poor Drug Compliance Among Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: An Experience from Rural Indonesia.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Non-Adherence Rate to Oral Mesalamine in Ulcerative Colitis Patients: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Few interventions and programmes have proved to be effective in increasing therapeutic adherence. Numerous efforts have been made to identify key factors that significantly influence adherence. In older adults, non-adherence can result from several problems, including insufficient income, lack of health insurance, multimorbidities, polypharmacy, functional disabilities, low medication literacy and demographic factors. However, psychological and psychosocial factors are often neglected in the study of patient-related factors. This scoping review aimed to study the perceptions and self-perceptions that influence all dimensions of therapeutic adherence in older adults with chronic conditions. This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the PCC strategy and following the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Three databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus) were searched from 2014 to the date of the research. In the initial search in the databases, 910 articles were retrieved. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 15 studies were selected for inclusion. In the selected studies, the factors most consistently associated with perceptions and self-perceptions influencing adherence were: perceived self-efficacy, perception of illness, beliefs about medications, self-perception of physical health status, self-perception of mental health status, perception of social support and perception of ageing. Furthermore, it was identified that there are few studies on patients' perceptions and self-perceptions related to treatment. The way adherence and related factors were assessed was mainly through the use of self-report scales. Concluding, this scoping review sheds light on the complex factors that influence therapeutic adherence in older adults, emphasizing the role of perceptions and self-perceptions. The psychological and subjective aspects that affect the perceptions and self-perceptions of the older adult population concerning the treatment of chronic diseases have not been deeply studied. Research involving interviews and focus groups with this population can lead to a better understanding of non-adherence and promote effective interventions to increase adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.