ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Clinical value of the nomogram model based on endoscopic ultrasonography radiomics and clinical indicators in identifying benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of Explainable Artificial Intelligence Based on Visual Explanation in Digestive Endoscopy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Development and validation of an easy-to-use nomogram for predicting pancreatic malignancy in patients with pancreatic mass.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Based on endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) radiomics and clinical data, we constructed a radiomics model and a nomogram model for identifying benign and malignant pancreatic lesions, and explored the diagnostic performance of these two prediction models. Methods: Images and clinical data of 151 patients with pancreatic lesions detected by EUS from January 2018 to September 2023 were retrospectively collected. The patients were randomly divided into a training set and a validation set at a ratio of 7:3. Through feature extraction and feature screening of EUS images, we calculated the radiomics score (rad-score) to realize the construction of the radiomics model. Collecting the clinical data, laboratory test results, and rad-scores from patients, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to screen statistically significant influencing factors that could help identify benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas, and a nomogram model was constructed. The diagnostic performance and clinical utility of the two prediction models were evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Through feature extraction and screening, eight non-zero coefficient features were finally selected to calculate the rad-score. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that rad-score, age, and CA199 were the influencing factors in predicting benign and malignant pancreatic lesions. A nomogram model was constructed based on the three factors. In the validation set, the nomogram model exhibited superior performance with an AUC = 0.865 (95% CI 0.761-0.968) compared to the radiomics prediction model. The calibration curve and DCA depicted that the nomogram model demonstrated superior accuracy and yielded a higher net benefit for clinical decision-making compared to the radiomics prediction model. Conclusion: Based on EUS radiomics and clinical indicators, we constructed a promising nomogram model to accurately identify benign and malignant pancreatic lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.