ArticleFrontiers in medical technology2025
Impact of circuit configuration on the mechanical performance of CPAP therapy devices: an experimental study.
Article in Frontiers in medical technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: CPAP therapy treats various respiratory disorders. The overall performance of therapy delivery can be affected by the adopted circuit configuration. Recently, parallel to the canonical open configuration (OC), closed configurations (CC) have been proposed with potential advantages in terms of oxygen consumption, noise, airway dryness and contamination. However, the mechanical performance of CPAP devices in CC has been marginally investigated. The aim of this study is to clarify whether CPAP therapy delivered in CC configuration retains mechanical performances equivalent to that achieved in the canonical OC stipulated by the manufacturers. Methods: OCs and CCs implemented on seven different ventilation devices, classified as flowmeter, obstructive sleep apnoea device, and mechanical ventilator, were tested at different set CPAP levels. Mask and helmet interfaces were tested, and healthy, post-surgery and ARDS respiratory conditions were simulated. The mechanical performance was compared in terms of mean static pressure (P Results: The mechanical performances of CCs with helmet interface were comparable to canonical OCs used with mask interface. Globally, a CC supplied a reduced Pmean (on average, -1.3 cmH Conclusion: The closed configuration proved its capability to effectively deliver CPAP therapy, thus making its intrinsic advantages available for future clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.