ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Shared diagnostic biomarkers and underlying mechanisms between endometriosis and recurrent implantation failure.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Identifying Predictive Biomarkers and Immune Infiltration Features in Endometriosis.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endometriosis (EMs) is a common condition that causes dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, and infertility, affecting millions of women worldwide. Despite the use of assisted reproductive technology, EMs patients often experience lower embryo implantation rates and recurrent implantation failure (RIF) due to impaired uterine endometrial receptivity. This study aims to identify shared diagnostic genes and underlying mechanisms between EMs and RIF using integrated transcriptomic analysis and machine learning with Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets. Methods: We analyzed GSE11691, GSE7305, GSE111974, and GSE103465 as training datasets for EMs and RIF, and GSE25628 and GSE92324 as validation datasets. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) identified key genes specific to and shared by EMs and RIF. Machine learning algorithms were used to determine the shared diagnostic gene, whose performance was validated in both training and validation datasets. Single-gene Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) revealed shared biological processes in EMs and RIF, while CIBERSORT analysis highlighted similarities and differences in immune infiltration between the two conditions. Finally, endometrial samples from healthy controls, EMs, and RIF patients were collected, and qRT-PCR was performed to validate the diagnostic gene. Results: We identified 48 shared key genes between EMs and RIF. The diagnostic gene EHF was selected through machine learning algorithms, and its diagnostic performance was validated in both training and validation datasets. ROC curve analysis demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy of EHF for both diseases. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) revealed that both conditions shared biological processes, including dysregulated extracellular matrix remodeling and abnormal immune infiltration. Furthermore, we validated the expression of EHF in endometrial samples from healthy controls, EMs, and RIF patients. Additionally, we characterized the immune microenvironment in EMs and RIF, highlighting changes in immune cell components associated with EHF. Discussion: The diagnostic gene EHF identified in this study may serve as a key link between EMs and RIF. The shared pathological processes in both conditions involve alterations in the extracellular matrix and subsequent changes in the immune microenvironment. These findings provide novel insights into potential therapeutic strategies for improving infertility treatment in patients with EMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.