ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2025
Exploring the potential association between stimulant or atomoxetine use and suicidal or self-injurious behaviors in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: real-world insights from the FAERS database.
Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating adverse events reported for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in osteoarthritis: a real-world pharmacovigilance study.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the potential correlation between commonly prescribed attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications and suicidal or self-injurious behaviors (SSIBs) among the pediatric population by exploring the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. The FAERS database (2004Q1-2023Q4) was queried and SSIBs cases associated with stimulants (methylphenidate, and amphetamine) or atomoxetine were identified. The signals for SSIBs were analyzed using disproportionate methods, and the accuracy of the results was validated through sensitivity analysis with multifactor logistic regression. Time-to-onset analysis explored factors affecting SSIBs manifestation. Disproportionality analysis revealed a significant negative association between methylphenidate and SSIBs, while atomoxetine exhibited a significant positive correlation with SSIBs. The frequency of SSIBs was lower with stimulants alone or with the combined use of stimulants and atomoxetine compared to atomoxetine alone. Time-to-onset analysis indicated that all cases were of the early failure type, with the median time to onset of SSIBs associated with atomoxetine occurring later than that linked to stimulants. Stratification by age showed that in the stimulant group, the median time to SSIBs was longer for patients aged 13-17 years compared to those aged 6-12 years. Conversely, the opposite trend was observed in the atomoxetine group. The observed differences in time to onset highlight the importance of individualized screening for SSIBs across various populations, ultimately improving patient outcomes in the follow-up of stimulants or atomoxetine recipients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40047929What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.