ArticlePloS one2025
Prediction of drug target interaction based on under sampling strategy and random forest algorithm.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Algorithms to Assets: A Comprehensive Review of AI's Role in Preclinical Drug Discovery and the Hurdles to Clinical Translation.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Evaluating the evolutionary relationship of TATA binding protein (TBP) with various folding patterns of protein domains using support vector machine (SVM).Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrative multi-omics and computational modeling reveal RPL22-driven skin aging mechanisms under PM2.5 exposure and identify high-stability natural inhibitors.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Enhancing drug repositioning: A multi-class ensemble model for drug-target interaction prediction with action type categorization.PloS one · 2025Article
- Correction: Prediction of drug target interaction based on under sampling strategy and random forest algorithm.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug target interactions (DTIs) play a crucial role in drug discovery and development. The prediction of DTIs based on computational method can effectively assist the experimental techniques for DTIs identification, which are time-consuming and expensive. However, the current computational models suffer from low accuracy and high false positive rate in the prediction of DTIs, especially for datasets with extremely unbalanced sample categories. To accurately identify the interaction between drugs and target proteins, a variety of descriptors that fully show the characteristic information of drugs and targets are extracted and applied to the integrated method random forest (RF) in this work. Here, the random projection method is adopted to reduce the feature dimension such that simplify the model calculation. In addition, to balance the number of samples in different categories, a down sampling method NearMiss (NM) which can control the number of samples is used. Based on the gold standard datasets (nuclear receptors, ion channel, GPCRs and enzymes), the proposed method achieves the auROC of 92.26%, 98.21%, 97.65%, 99.33%, respectively. The experimental results show that the proposed method yields significantly higher performance than that of state-of-the-art methods in predicting drug target interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.