ArticleBMJ open2025
Perceptions of occupational physicians in supporting transgender and gender-diverse people (returning) at work - a focus group study:
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to explore the role of occupational physicians (OPs) in supporting transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) workers during gender transition and return to work (RTW) following gender-affirming (medical) interventions.
designWe conducted a qualitative study (ONZ-2023-0026) using focus groups.
settingThis study involved OPs in Belgium.
participantsTwo semistructured focus group interviews were held with 19 OPs working in occupational health services in Belgium in May and November 2023. Purposeful sampling was used, which included OPs with at least 2 years of seniority and experience with TGD people or inclusive company culture. Participants were predominantly white and cisgender, with varying levels of seniority and sectoral coverage.
methodsQualitative data was thematically analysed using Braun and Clarke to find patterned meaning.
resultsThe analysis created four themes: (1) 'What is the right professional attitude?: You never get a second chance to make a good first impression' discusses the aspects of professional attitude alongside ethical considerations; (2) 'Controlled open-mindedness' entails values and views of gender in light of medicine, the individual worker, organisations and society; (3) 'The balance game: "Fingerspitzengefühl" (intuitive flair or instinct) without treating' and (4) 'Being gender-bombarded: the need for OP-tailored training and best practices'. These themes highlighted the limited knowledge and experience of OPs regarding gender-affirming care (GAC) and their need for additional training. Participants struggled to find the best gender-inclusive professional approach to support TGD workers as well as employers and require 'best practices'. Implementing overarching legislative frameworks can help OPs and companies create an inclusive work environment considering the differences in occupational sectors and company culture. RTW policies should focus on abilities without medicalisation and stigmatisation and involve multiple stakeholders.
conclusionsOccupational medicine can be crucial in improving the health and well-being of TGD workers. However, with the ageing workforce, gender diversity poses new 'hidden' challenges for sick leave management, RTW and sensitive health surveillance. Multidisciplinary training with stakeholders and GAC professionals can enhance occupational practice and equip future OPs with the necessary competencies and confidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.