ArticleScientific reports2025
Kleptomania on the impulsive-compulsive spectrum. Clinical and therapeutic considerations for women.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The current literature regarding kleptomania (KM) is scarce, especially regarding treatment approaches and outcomes. The aims of the present study involved: (1) exploring characteristics of people with KM (with and without co-occurring eating disorders (EDs)); (2) considering KM along an impulsive-compulsive spectrum; and, (3) investigating treatment outcomes in a clinical sample of female patients with KM. The study sample included 150 female participants with either a diagnosis of KM only (n = 13), co-occurring KM and EDs (n = 71), or healthy control individuals (HCs) (n = 66). The KM-only group was diagnosed using DSM-5 criteria and by a face-to-face clinical interviewed. EDs were diagnosed through a face-to-face semi-structured clinical interview based on DSM-5 criteria, and co-occurring KM was self-reported by patients. Psychopathology, impulsivity and personality features were assessed. Clinical groups received cognitive behavioral treatment. Compared to HCs, both KM groups reported more psychopathology, higher impulsivity, and more dysfunctional personality features. Relative to the clinical groups, that with KM + ED was more impulsive; in contrast, harm avoidance scores were higher in the KM-only group. Both clinical groups present poor treatment outcomes. KM can present impulsive and compulsive features, and these may impact treatment outcomes. Co-occurring KM and EDs may worsen clinical profiles and warrant specific interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.