ArticleScientific reports2025
Blood pressure levels and risk of end-stage renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetes who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention: a nationwide population-based study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intensive vs standard blood pressure control in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and GRADE-based meta-analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Survey on Hypertensive Nephropathy Among Hypertensive Patients in Xinjiang, China: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Church-Sponsored Promotornan di Salú/Community Health Worker-Led Health Fair Promoting Hypertension Awareness in Willemstad, Curaçao: A Pilot Study Assessing Participant Satisfaction and Experience.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated the effect of differential blood pressure (BP) levels on future end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and established coronary artery disease with a previous record of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Using health check-up data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service (2015-2016), we analyzed 80,187 T2DM patients with a history of PCI. Patients were categorized by BP levels measured: systolic BP < 120, 120-129 (reference), 130-139, 140-149, and ≥150 mmHg; diastolic BP < 70, 70-79 (reference), 80-89, and ≥90 mmHg. Incident ESRD, defined by disease codes and renal replacement therapy initiation, was the primary outcome. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression assessed adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence intervals) by BP group. Mean age was 67.7 years; 80.9% used antihypertensives. ESRD incidence was 1.70% (1,362 patients) over 4.7 years. After adjustment for confounding factors, the HR of ESRD patients significantly and sequentially increased in the higher BP groups. Similar trends were seen with pulse pressure (PP). Subgroup analysis showed stronger BP-ESRD association in < 65-year-olds compared to those aged ≥65 years. ESRD risk linearly increased with systolic BP and had a J-shaped association with diastolic BP, with the lowest risk at 68 mmHg. Elevated BP, including PP, correlated with ESRD risk in a dose‒response manner among T2DM patients with a previous record of PCI. Strict BP control is crucial for preventing ESRD in these high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.