Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40050725›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2025

A high-resolution model of gene expression during Gossypium hirsutum (cotton) fiber development.

Corrinne E Grover, Josef J Jareczek, Sivakumar Swaminathan, Youngwoo Lee, Alexander H Howell, Heena Rani, Mark A Arick, Alexis G Leach, Emma R Miller, Pengcheng Yang and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Regulatory divergence of homoeologs underlies network optimization for fiber improvement in domesticated cotton.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Harnessing polyploidy for climate-resilient crops: Lessons from the evolutionary model, allotetraploid cotton.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Review
  4. Genomic diversity and the domestication history of cotton (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Comparative multi "omics" profiling ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Corrinne E GroverDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA. corrinne@iastate.edu.
Josef J JareczekDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Sivakumar SwaminathanRoy J Carver Department of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Molecular Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Youngwoo LeeDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Center for Plant Biology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Alexander H HowellDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Center for Plant Biology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Heena RaniDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Center for Plant Biology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Mark A ArickInstitute for Genomics, Biocomputing & Biotechnology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, 39762, USA.
Alexis G LeachDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Emma R MillerDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Pengcheng YangDepartment of Statistics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Guanjing HuState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang, 455000, China.
Xianpeng XiongState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang, 455000, China.
Eileen L MalleryDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Center for Plant Biology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Daniel G PetersonInstitute for Genomics, Biocomputing & Biotechnology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, 39762, USA.
Jun XieDepartment of Statistics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Candace H HaiglerDepartment of Crop & Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
Olga A ZabotinaRoy J Carver Department of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Molecular Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Daniel B SzymanskiDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Center for Plant Biology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Jonathan F WendelDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation 1951819USDA-ARS 58-6066-0-066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCotton fiber development relies on complex and intricate biological processes to transform newly differentiated fiber initials into the mature, extravagantly elongated cellulosic cells that are the foundation of this economically important cash crop. Here we extend previous research into cotton fiber development by employing controlled conditions to minimize variability and utilizing time-series sampling and analyses to capture daily transcriptomic changes from early elongation through the early stages of secondary wall synthesis (6 to 24 days post anthesis; DPA).

resultsA majority of genes are expressed in fiber, largely partitioned into two major coexpression modules that represent genes whose expression generally increases or decreases during development. Differential gene expression reveals a massive transcriptomic shift between 16 and 17 DPA, corresponding to the onset of the transition phase that leads to secondary wall synthesis. Subtle gene expression changes are captured by the daily sampling, which are discussed in the context of fiber development. Coexpression and gene regulatory networks are constructed and associated with phenotypic aspects of fiber development, including turgor and cellulose production. Key genes are considered in the broader context of plant secondary wall synthesis, noting their known and putative roles in cotton fiber development.

conclusionsThe analyses presented here highlight the importance of fine-scale temporal sampling on understanding developmental processes and offer insight into genes and regulatory networks that may be important in conferring the unique fiber phenotype.

Indexed as

Cotton FiberGene Expression Regulation, PlantGossypiumCelluloseGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksTranscriptomeCelluloseCellulose synthaseCotton fiberDevelopmental transcriptomicsFiber developmentTurgor

Identifiers

PMID40050725
PMCPMC11884195

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.