ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Shared medication coordination in a social psychiatric residence: adaptation to meet local requirements.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundShared medication coordination (MedCo) is vital yet difficult to manage for residents living with severe mental disorders in residential care, where multidisciplinary teams provide support. A successful Shared MedCo model in one residence included three core components: "shared decision-making," "patient involvement" and "MedCo". This model was effective but transfer to other residential settings needed implementation adaptation. The aim of this study was to meet local MedCo requirements by achieving a good fit between a Shared MedCo intervention core components and a social psychiatric residential context.
methodsThe methodology was guided by a complex intervention adaptation framework involving co-creation with stakeholders to gather iterative feedback. The intervention was adapted through a systematic four-phase process and tested through shared consultations. Ten residents took part in the test, and the intervention's feasibility and acceptability were assessed.
findingsThe adaptation process ensured a good fit between the intervention's core components and the new context. Stakeholder input provided crucial content and contextual insights, while planned adaptations laid the foundation for modulating the individual residence Shared MedCo model. Iterative adaptations during the test phase refined the intervention, leading to near-routine performance by the tenth consultation. Residents gained a stronger voice in their healthcare, and all ten had their medication coordinated and optimised. The intervention was found feasible and acceptable.
conclusionFor effective implementation, complex multidisciplinary Shared MedCo interventions require contextual adaptation and active stakeholder involvement. The shared MedCo intervention offers a guideline for achieving a good fit between the intervention core components and diverse residential contexts, ensuring successful medication coordination for residents living with severe mental disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.