Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40050874›Full record

ReviewMolecular cancer2025

Contract to kill: GNAS mutation.

Pratima Raut, Poompozhil Mathivanan, Surinder K Batra, Moorthy P Ponnusamy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pratima RautDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198-5870, USA.
Poompozhil MathivananDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198-5870, USA.
Surinder K BatraDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198-5870, USA. sbatra@unmc.edu.
Moorthy P PonnusamyDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198-5870, USA. mpalanim@unmc.edu.

Funding

Pancreatic Cancer Detection ConsortiumU01CA210240 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI Michael A. Hollingsworth · 2017 to 2026
$12.9M
Validation of biomarkers for risk prediction and early diagnosis of Pancreatic AdenocarcinomaU01CA200466 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Surinder K. Batra, Randall Brand · 2016 to 2026
$11.3M
Project 3: MUC16-Mediated Metabolic Reprograming Induces PC MetastasisP01CA217798 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI THAYER, SARAH P · 2018 to 2022
$8.1M
Connectivity mapping identified novel combination therapy for glioblastomaR01CA273319 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BATRA, SURINDER K., SHONKA, NICOLE · 2022 to 2025
$2.2M
Targeted Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic CancerR01CA195586 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BATRA, SURINDER K., JAIN, MANEESH · 2015 to 2019
$2.2M
Novel Therapy to Inhibit IPMN ProgressionR01CA263575 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI BATRA, SURINDER K., MALAFA, MOKENGE P. · 2022 to 2024
$2.1M
Targeting Mucin and EGFR Axis in Pancreatic CancerR01CA183459 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BATRA, SURINDER K. · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA217798NCI NIH HHS R01 CA183459NCI NIH HHS R01 CA195586NCI NIH HHS R01 CA263575NCI NIH HHS R01 CA273319NCI NIH HHS U01 CA200466NCI NIH HHS U01 CA210240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mutation in Gsα-coding GNAS exons, popular as gsp oncogene, is the most frequent mutation across all heterotrimeric G proteins involved in oncogenesis. GNAS R201, the most frequently mutated, followed by Q227, are found predominantly across various neoplasms and cancers such as IPMN, pituitary, thyroid, appendiceal, colorectal, etc. This review emphasizes the pivotal significance of the gsp oncogene and its ramifications underpinning the sustained addiction to GNAS mutation. Recent studies delineating the mechanistic intricacies that provide solid evidence of the profound impact of oncogenic GNAS on tumor formation, progression, and maintenance are highlighted. We have leveraged the discoveries of Gsα as an ideal neoantigen candidate for vaccine therapy, allele-specific inhibitors, and cyclic peptide-based small molecular inhibitors for G proteins and explored the therapeutic potential to target oncogenic GNAS directly. Alternative therapeutic modalities and patient-centric studies to mitigate the impact of GNAS mutations are also discussed. The exposition of novel studies and strategies designed to address the potential challenges inherent in these approaches of targeting the activating mutations of GNAS, along with probable avenues for further investigation, are highlighted. This review aims to reverberate the current understanding of the oncogenic potential of GNAS, the genomic and biological landscape of GNAS-driven neoplasms and cancers, and potential therapeutic strategies against them.

Indexed as

ChromograninsGTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, GsMutationNeoplasmsAnimalsHumansChromograninsGNAS protein, humanGTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, GsGNASGNAS R201GsαMutationNeoplasmTumor

Identifiers

PMID40050874
PMCPMC11887407

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.