ArticleJournal of radiation research2025
Development of a deep learning-based model to evaluate changes during radiotherapy using cervical cancer digital pathology.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to create a deep learning-based classification model for cervical cancer biopsy before and during radiotherapy, visualize the results on whole slide images (WSIs), and explore the clinical significance of obtained features. This study included 95 patients with cervical cancer who received radiotherapy between April 2013 and December 2020. Hematoxylin-eosin stained biopsies were digitized to WSIs and divided into small tiles. Our model adopted the feature extractor of DenseNet121 and the classifier of the support vector machine. About 12 400 tiles were used for training the model and 6000 tiles for testing. The model performance was assessed on a per-tile and per-WSI basis. The resultant probability was defined as radiotherapy status probability (RSP) and its color map was visualized on WSIs. Survival analysis was performed to examine the clinical significance of the RSP. In the test set, the trained model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.76 per-tile and 0.95 per-WSI. In visualization, the model focused on viable tumor components and stroma in tumor biopsies. While survival analysis failed to show the prognostic impact of RSP during treatment, cases with low RSP at diagnosis had prolonged overall survival compared to those with high RSP (P = 0.045). In conclusion, we successfully developed a model to classify biopsies before and during radiotherapy and visualized the result on slide images. Low RSP cases before treatment had a better prognosis, suggesting that tumor morphologic features obtained using the model may be useful for predicting prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.