ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Circulating branched-chain amino acids and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in the UK biobank.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Anti-Inflammatory Nutrition in Metabolic Syndrome and Cardiometabolic Diseases.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Diet-Associated Regulation of Cardiac Metabolism: Molecular Determinants and Pathophysiological Consequences.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Sex differences in molecular pathways underlying cardiovascular health in Black Americans.Research square · 2026Article
- Personalized nutrition for healthy aging: precision diets based on genomic, metabolic, and microbiome profiles.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Serum Branched-Chain Amino Acids and Chronic Rheumatic Heart Diseases: Evidence From a Population-Based Prospective Study.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the relationship between circulating branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in a national population-based cohort study. Methods: UK Biobank, a prospective study involving 22 recruitment centers across the United Kingdom. For this analysis, we included 266,840 participants from the UK Biobank who had available BCAA data and no history of MACE at baseline. Cox regression analysis was conducted to evaluate these associations, adjusting for potential confounders. Results: During a 13.80 ± 0.83-year follow-up, 52,598 participants experienced MACE, with the incidence of MACE increasing progressively across quintiles of circulating BCAAs, isoleucine, leucine, and valine. Overall, the fifth quintile exhibited a 7-12% higher MACE risk compared to the second quintile. In males, BCAAs were not associated with MACE risk. However, increased risks were observed for isoleucine (8-12% in higher quintiles), leucine (9% in the first quintile and 6% in the fifth quintile), and valine (8% in the first quintile). In females, higher quintiles of BCAAs, isoleucine, leucine, and valine were associated with increased MACE risk, ranging from 9% to 12%. Among participants under 65y, higher quintiles of BCAAs, isoleucine, and leucine were associated with increased MACE risk, while valine showed no significant association. No association was found in participants aged 65 and older. These analyses were adjusted for multiple potential confounders. Conclusion: Generally, higher levels of BCAAs, isoleucine, leucine, and valine were associated with an increased risk of MACE, except in participants older than 65. Additionally, in males, the lowest quintiles of leucine and valine were also associated with an increased risk of MACE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.