Observational studyUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2025
The effect of clinical, bifurcation, and aneurysm morphological characteristics on the risk of rupture in internal carotid artery bifurcation aneurysms.
Observational study in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Internal carotid artery bifurcation aneurysms are probably formed to decrease the abnormally-enhanced hemodynamic stresses caused by direct flow impaction.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to examine the clinical and morphological characteristics associated with the risk of rupture of internal carotid artery (ICA) bifurcation aneurysms (ICAbifAn) by comparing ruptured and unruptured aneurysms.
methodsThe two-center observational study included 66 patients with ICAbifAn (4.3%) identified from a database of 1,512 patients with intracranial aneurysms. The following data were collected and evaluated for their association with rupture risk: demo-graphic data, medical history, aneurysm neck and dome size, bottleneck factor, aspect ratio (AR), size ratio, dome projection and localization, ICA (D1), M1, and A1 diameters, and ICA-M1 (β), ICA-A1 (γ), and M1-A1 (α) angles.
resultsSixty ICAbifAn cases were included in the study. Of these, 26 (43.3%) were ruptured aneurysms, and 34 (56.7%) were un-ruptured aneurysms. Patients in the ruptured group were younger than those in the unruptured group (p=0.017). The ruptured group had a smaller α angle (p=0.018) and significantly narrower A1 (p=0.004) and M1 (p=0.005) vessel diameters compared to the unruptured group. Irregular shape (p=0.001), AR>1.7, and a narrow neck (p=0.007) were significant predictors of rupture. Logistic regression analysis revealed that AR, α angle, and M1 and A1 diameters were significant predictors of aneurysm rupture. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, an α angle cutoff of 126.2° exhibited a sensitivity of 61.5% and a specificity of 67.7% (area under the curve [AUC]=0.67). A cutoff M1 diameter of 2 mm exhibited a sensitivity and specificity of 61.5% and 76.4%, respectively (AUC=0.71). Additionally, a cutoff A1 diameter of 1.5 mm exhibited a sensitivity and specificity of 73.1% and 71.1%, respectively (AUC=0.75).
conclusionThis study provided insights into the impact of aneurysm and bifurcation geometry on the risk of ICAbifAn rupture, which may also be applicable to more common bifurcation site aneurysms. Simple morphological measurements at the bifurcation region, where instability prevails, may serve as useful indicators for clinicians evaluating the likelihood of ICAbifAn rupture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.