Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40053154›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025

A pilot study of a targeted cognitive intervention for cancer survivors.

Joaquin A Anguera, Karin Snowberg, Steven M Paul, Bruce A Cooper, Kate Oppegaard, Carolyn Harris, Christine Miaskowski

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Methodology of analysis of cognitive impairment in longitudinal randomized clinical trials in oncology: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joaquin A AngueraSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Karin SnowbergSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Steven M PaulSchool of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Bruce A CooperSchool of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Kate OppegaardVA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA.
Carolyn HarrisSchool of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Christine MiaskowskiSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. chris.miaskowski@ucsf.edu.

Funding

VARC CoreP30AG044281 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Louise C. Walter · 2013 to 2026
$19.9M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG044281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe primary aims of this four week pilot randomized clinical trial (RCT) involving a targeted cognitive intervention (TCI, n = 25) compared to an expectancy matched active control intervention (EMACI, n = 24), in a sample of cancer survivors were to: determine recruitment and retention rates; evaluate preliminary efficacy to improve three objective measures of cognitive function (i.e., attention, working memory, multi-tasking); evaluate adherence rates for and satisfaction with the interventions, and evaluate for treatment-related adverse events (e.g., nausea, motion sickness).

methodsCancer survivors were recruited from previous studies through email. Following a screening call, survivors who consented to participate were oriented to the study measures and procedures via Zoom. Survivors were randomized to the TCI or EMACI and mailed an iPad with the software for their specific intervention and the Adaptive Cognitive Evaluation Explorer (ACE-X, the objective measure of cognitive function). Survivors used the intervention for 25 min per day at least 5 days per week. Differences in objective measures of attention, working memory, and multi-tasking were evaluated using multilevel regression analyses.

resultsFor the sustained attention measure, a significant cross-level interaction was found in favor of the TCI group. While improvements in multi-tasking occurred in both groups, while not statistically significant, the trend was larger for the TCI group. Equally important, in both groups, adherence with the intervention was high and adverse effects were minimal.

conclusionsThese preliminary findings provide promising evidence of feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy that warrant evaluation in a RCT with a larger sample of cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsCognitionCognitive Behavioral TherapyNeoplasmsSurvivorsAdultAgedAttentionFemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePatient SatisfactionPilot ProjectsAttentionCancerCognitive impairmentCognitive interventionMulti-taskingWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID40053154
PMCPMC11889051

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.