ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2025
Perspectives and clinical practices on fertility preservation for young hematologic patients: a qualitative study of healthcare providers across multiple hospitals in China.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Shared Decision-Making on Fertility Preservation in Reproductive-Aged Women with Gynecological Cancer: A Qualitative Study of Patients' and Health Care Professionals' Perspectives.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to understand healthcare providers' (HCPs) perspective and clinical practices regarding fertility preservation in young hematologic patients, particularly from hematology, reproductive medicine, and ethics committee professionals.
methodsAn empirical phenomenological approach was employed. HCPs were recruited from the hematology, reproductive medicine, and ethics committee professionals of eight tertiary hospitals in China using purposive sampling. They participated in semi-structured, in-depth face-to-face individual interviews. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using Colaizzi's phenomenological method.
resultsA total of 33 HCPs were recruited, including 12 hematology physicians, two pediatric hematology physicians, six hematology nurses, nine reproductive medicine physicians, two reproductive medicine nurses, and two ethics committee members. The analysis revealed three major themes and associated subthemes: (1) HCPs' overall perspectives of fertility preservation: all recognized its importance and feasibility in young patients with hematologic diseases, though interdepartmental differences; (2) Fertility preservation practice status: still in its early stages, communication strategies are crucial, and balancing the urgency of disease treatment with fertility preservation remains a challenge; and (3) Multi-level challenges and recommendations: challenges exist across the medical system, patient-related factors, and sociocultural levels, with recommendations proposed to address some barriers.
conclusionsHCPs recognized the importance and feasibility of fertility preservation for hematologic patients. However, its implementation faces challenges at multiple levels, including the medical system, patient-related factors, and sociocultural influences. To facilitate early discussions and informed decision-making about fertility preservation, it is crucial to enhance multidisciplinary collaboration, provide better support for patients and their families, and strengthen legal and policy frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.