SynthesisJournal of religion and health2025
Spirituality and Religiosity in Rheumatic Diseases: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of religion and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Influence of Spirituality in the Care of Patients with Advanced Chronic Illnesses and at the End of Life: An Integrative Review.Journal of religion and health · 2026Review
- Understanding spiritual well-being in patients with systemic sclerosis and its effect on the illness: a scoping review.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Article
- Article
- Rocky Paths: Family and Society as a Double-Edged Sword in the Strategies of Patients in Coping with Scleroderma: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several studies have demonstrated the influence of religiosity and spirituality (R/S) on patients with chronic diseases. However, few studies have explored the influence of R/S on autoimmune/non-autoimmune rheumatic diseases. We conducted a systematic review of the literature on the impact of religiosity and spirituality (R/S) on the health of patients with (autoimmune and non-autoimmune) rheumatic diseases. Systematic review of the literature according to the PRISMA protocol. Articles published between January 1912 and September 2024 in the Virtual Health Library (VHL), PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and PsychInfo databases were included. Few studies have explored the influence of R/S on non-autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Most studies have evaluated the impact of R/S on central sensitization pain syndromes, such as fibromyalgia, and degenerative diseases, such as osteoarthritis. Only two studies have been conducted in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, and idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Among the 1614 articles found, 17 met the eligibility criteria. In the quality analysis of the studies, 76.5% were classified as "good." The findings were then divided into "psychological and physical impacts of R/S in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases" and "psychological and physical impacts of R/S in patients with non-autoimmune rheumatic diseases". The literature demonstrates the impact of R/S on improving quality of life, especially on lower pain scores, reducing stress, and improving mood and life satisfaction. This evidence is the most robust for non-autoimmune rheumatic diseases. The effects of R/S on non-psychological aspects are uncertain. Additionally, studies have small samples, and most are not longitudinal. Therefore, longitudinal studies that consider differences such as the type of religion, standardization of R/S level mapping methods, and larger samples are necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40053293What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.