Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40053765›Full record

SynthesisJMIR mHealth and uHealth2025

Applying AI in the Context of the Association Between Device-Based Assessment of Physical Activity and Mental Health: Systematic Review.

Simon Woll, Dennis Birkenmaier, Gergely Biri, Rebecca Nissen, Luisa Lutz, Marc Schroth, Ulrich W Ebner-Priemer, Marco Giurgiu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Simon WollMental mHealth Lab, Institute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8917-678X
Dennis BirkenmaierDepartment of Embedded Systems and Sensors Engineering, Research Center for Information Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4021-1386
Gergely BiriDepartment of Embedded Systems and Sensors Engineering, Research Center for Information Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7979-1292
Rebecca NissenMental mHealth Lab, Institute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5006-9282
Luisa LutzMental mHealth Lab, Institute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1128-8276
Marc SchrothDepartment of Embedded Systems and Sensors Engineering, Research Center for Information Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3596-2003
Ulrich W Ebner-PriemerMental mHealth Lab, Institute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2769-5944
Marco GiurgiuMental mHealth Lab, Institute of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6684-3463

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWearable technology is used by consumers worldwide for continuous activity monitoring in daily life but more recently also for classifying or predicting mental health parameters like stress or depression levels. Previous studies identified, based on traditional approaches, that physical activity is a relevant factor in the prevention or management of mental health. However, upcoming artificial intelligence methods have not yet been fully established in the research field of physical activity and mental health.

objectiveThis systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of studies that integrated passive monitoring of physical activity data measured via wearable technology in machine learning algorithms for the detection, prediction, or classification of mental health states and traits.

methodsWe conducted a review of studies processing wearable data to gain insights into mental health parameters. Eligibility criteria were (1) the study uses wearables or smartphones to acquire physical behavior and optionally other sensor measurement data, (2) the study must use machine learning to process the acquired data, and (3) the study had to be published in a peer-reviewed English language journal. Studies were identified via a systematic search in 5 electronic databases.

resultsOf 11,057 unique search results, 49 published papers between 2016 and 2023 were included. Most studies examined the connection between wearable sensor data and stress (n=15, 31%) or depression (n=14, 29%). In total, 71% (n=35) of the studies had less than 100 participants, and 47% (n=23) had less than 14 days of data recording. More than half of the studies (n=27, 55%) used step count as movement measurement, and 44% (n=21) used raw accelerometer values. The quality of the studies was assessed, scoring between 0 and 18 points in 9 categories (maximum 2 points per category). On average, studies were rated 6.47 (SD 3.1) points.

conclusionsThe use of wearable technology for the detection, prediction, or classification of mental health states and traits is promising and offers a variety of applications across different settings and target groups. However, based on the current state of literature, the application of artificial intelligence cannot realize its full potential mostly due to a lack of methodological shortcomings and data availability. Future research endeavors may focus on the following suggestions to improve the quality of new applications in this context: first, by using raw data instead of already preprocessed data. Second, by using only relevant data based on empirical evidence. In particular, crafting optimal feature sets rather than using many individual detached features and consultation with in-field professionals. Third, by validating and replicating the existing approaches (ie, applying the model to unseen data). Fourth, depending on the research aim (ie, generalization vs personalization) maximizing the sample size or the duration over which data are collected.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceExerciseMental HealthWearable Electronic DevicesHumansartificial intelligencemachine learningmental healthmobile phonephysical behaviorsmartphonewearables

Identifiers

PMID40053765
PMCPMC11926455

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.