ArticleScientific reports2025
A real-world pharmacovigilance study of omalizumab using disproportionality analysis in the FDA adverse drug events reporting system database.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age-specific efficacy of biologics in severe asthma: a pediatric perspective.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Review
- The Expanding Role of Omalizumab: From Food Allergy to Drug Desensitization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Unraveling the mechanisms of irAEs in endometrial cancer immunotherapy: insights from FAERS and scRNA-seq data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Biologic Therapies for Severe Asthma: Current Insights and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Case Report: Omalizumab-associated hair loss: a case of eyebrow alopecia areata, literature review and FAERS database analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Omalizumab is a biologic agent used in the management of allergic conditions, including asthma and urticaria. Although the efficacy of omalizumab has been well established, its safety profile is primarily derived from clinical trials with limited sample sizes. To conduct a comprehensive evaluation of its safety in larger populations, this study conducted an extensive analysis of data sourced from the America Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), with the aim of elucidating adverse drug events associated with omalizumab in real-world settings. We extracted reports of adverse events associated with omalizumab from the FAERS database covering the period from the first quarter of 2004 to the second quarter of 2024. We assessed the significance of the association between omalizumab and adverse events using four distinct methods of disproportionality analysis. Furthermore, we analyzed adverse events across gender and age subgroups. We identified a total of 49,456 adverse event reports linked to omalizumab and pinpointed 357 adverse events related to omalizumab within 27 system organ classes. These adverse events encompassed several commonly reported reactions documented in the product labeling, including anaphylactic reactions (ROR: 17.28, 95%CI:16.62-17.96) and asthma (ROR:19.24, 95%CI:18.74-19.76), alongside unlisted reactions such as asthmatic crisis (ROR: 47.3, 95%CI: 43-52.03), lower respiratory tract congestion (ROR: 35.68, 95%CI: 30.42-41.84). Furthermore, the results of our analysis indicated that omalizumab-related adverse events displayed significant gender and age disparities. The median time to onset for all documented adverse events was approximately 145 days, with a substantial proportion occurring after one year of treatment. This study not only offers a significant reference for optimizing the utilization of omalizumab, enhancing its efficacy while minimizing potential side effects, but also facilitates the safe application and broader implementation of omalizumab in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.