SynthesisInternational journal of mental health nursing2025
Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) With Workforce Solutions for Sustainable Care: A Follow Up to Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (ML) Based Decision Support Systems in Mental Health.
Synthesis in International journal of mental health nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in mental health care: a scoping review of reviews.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- GymBuddy and Elomia, AI-integrated applications, effects on the mental health of the students with psychological disorders.BMC psychology · 2025Trial
- From algorithms to action: twenty years of lessons from digital mental health and the future of human flourishing.Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2026Article
- Review
- Ethical Responsibility in Medical AI: A Semi-Systematic Thematic Review and Multilevel Governance Model.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- AI-enabled remote learning: promoting educational equity and mental health sustainability in resource-scarce contexts.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence guidance in ethically challenging clinical scenarios in child and adolescent psychiatry: a qualitative study in the context of Turkiye.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- Cognitive-Behavioral and Psychodynamic Lenses on Adolescent Gaming Disorder Through AI-Generated Case Formulations: A Qualitative Analysis.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2025Article
- From promise to practice: insights into ChatGPT-4o use in child and adolescent mental health from professionals.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Achieving clinically meaningful outcomes in digital health: a six-step, cyclical precision engagement framework (ENGAGE).Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This integrative literature review examines the evolving role of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) based clinical decision support systems (CDSS) in mental health (MH) care, expanding on findings from a prior review (Higgins et al. 2023). Using and integrative review framework, a systematic search of six databases was conducted with a focus on primary research published between 2022 and 2024. Five studies met the inclusion criteria and were analysed for key themes, methodologies, and findings. The results reaffirm AI's potential to enhance MH care delivery by improving diagnostic accuracy, alleviating clinician workloads, and addressing missed care. New evidence highlights the importance of clinician trust, system transparency, and ethical concerns, including algorithmic bias and equity, particularly for vulnerable populations. Advancements in AI model complexity, such as multimodal learning systems, demonstrate improved predictive capacity but underscore the ongoing challenge of balancing interpretability with innovation. Workforce challenges, including clinician burnout and staffing shortages, persist as fundamental barriers that AI alone cannot resolve. The review not only confirms the findings from the first review but also adds new layers of complexity and understanding to the discourse on AI-based CDSS in MH care. While AI-driven CDSS holds significant promise for optimising MH care, sustainable improvements require the integration of AI solutions with systemic workforce enhancements. Future research should prioritise large-scale, longitudinal studies to ensure equitable, transparent, and effective implementation of AI in diverse clinical contexts. A balanced approach addressing both technological and workforce challenges remain critical for advancing mental health care delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.