Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40056243›Full record

ReviewJournal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs2025

Sedation management and processed EEG-based solutions during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a narrative review of key challenges and potential benefits.

Lajos Szentgyorgyi, Samuel Henry Howitt, Heather Iles-Smith, Bhuvaneswari Krishnamoorthy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lajos SzentgyorgyiSchool of Health and Society, University of Salford, Mary Seacole Building, Frederick Road Campus, Broad St, Frederick Road Campus, Salford, M6 6PU, UK. lajos.szentgyorgyi@mft.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1196-1758
Samuel Henry HowittSchool of Health and Society, University of Salford, Mary Seacole Building, Frederick Road Campus, Broad St, Frederick Road Campus, Salford, M6 6PU, UK.
Heather Iles-SmithSchool of Health and Society, University of Salford, Mary Seacole Building, Frederick Road Campus, Broad St, Frederick Road Campus, Salford, M6 6PU, UK.
Bhuvaneswari KrishnamoorthySchool of Health and Society, University of Salford, Mary Seacole Building, Frederick Road Campus, Broad St, Frederick Road Campus, Salford, M6 6PU, UK. B.Bibleraaj@salford.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an established technique for managing severe cardiorespiratory failure. However, it is invasive and requires profound analgo-sedation during initiation and often throughout the therapy. Managing sedation in venovenous (VV) ECMO patients is particularly challenging due to the impact of ECMO circuits on pharmacokinetics and specific patient requirements. This can lead to unpredictable sedative effects and require multiple drugs at higher doses. Additionally, sedation is usually managed with traditional scoring methods, which are subjective and invalid during neuromuscular blockade. These uncertainties may impact outcomes. Recent clinical practice increasingly focuses on reducing sedation to enable earlier physiotherapy and mobilisation, particularly in patients awaiting transplants or receiving mechanical circulatory support. In this context, processed electroencephalogram-based (pEEG) sedation monitoring might be promising, having shown benefits in general anaesthesia and intensive care. However, the technology has limitations, and its benefits in ECMO practice have yet to be formally evaluated. This review provides insights into the challenges of ECMO sedation, including pharmacokinetics, unique ECMO requirements, and the implications of inadequate sedation scores. Finally, it includes a brief overview of the practicality and limitations of pEEG monitoring during VV-ECMO, highlighting a significant research gap.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHypnotics and SedativesHumansHypnotics and SedativesCritical careExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationMonitoringProcessed EEGSedation

Identifiers

PMID40056243
PMCPMC12373690

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.