ReviewCurrent nutrition reports2025
Ketogenic Diet Intervention for Obesity Weight-Loss- A Narrative Review, Challenges, and Open Questions.
Review in Current nutrition reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Trial
- Sparing Muscle While Losing Fat: A Narrative Review of Ketogenic Diets and Lean Mass Preservation During Weight Loss.Nutrients · 2026Review
- The Ketogenic Diet in the Prevention and Treatment of Hypertension (HTN).Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Ketogenic Diet in Obesity and Diabetes: A Narrative Review.Nutrients · 2026Review
- The Ketogenic Diet in Obesity Management: Friend or Foe?Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe ketogenic diet (KD) has gained clinical attention for its potential benefits in weight loss and metabolic syndrome. By mimicking fasting through carbohydrate (CHO) restriction, KD shifts energy utilization to ketone bodies (KB) instead of glucose. Despite promising results, the effects on different weight loss indicators remain controversial, with challenges in monitoring adherence standards, optimal macronutrient composition, potential risks, and long-term sustainability. This article aims to review the different weight-loss outcomes of KD interventions for obesity, monitored by KB (adherence indication). RECENT
findingsCurrent literature on KD interventions for obesity weight loss monitored by KB show reduction in different outcomes, including body weight, body mass index, waist circumference, visceral adipose tissue, fat mass, and body fat percentage. Minor decreases in lean body mass and skeletal muscle mass were noted without resistance training. Variability existed in adherence (KB markers), CHO intake (7-27% of daily energy), diet duration (28 days to 12 months), and follow-up frequency (weekly to biannual). KD, particularly accompanied by exercise, positively influenced appetite regulation. KD interventions improves weight-related outcomes in participants with obesity but presents challenges in lean body mass reduction without resistance training and adherence variability. Standardizing methodologies, refining interventions and suitability to sub-populations, setting KB markers, and defining clinical relevance are essential for optimizing KD effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.